Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

False Electronic Hijacks WERE Injected onto NEADS Radar Screens While 9/11 Was Occurring

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 10:42 AM
Original message
False Electronic Hijacks WERE Injected onto NEADS Radar Screens While 9/11 Was Occurring
Edited on Sun Aug-15-10 01:03 PM by undergroundrailroad
Another important, excellent article from "Shoestring911". This is piece particularly interesting since the idea that the hijacking exercises interfered with the 9/11 response has been mocked and/or ignored and/or totally downplayed here.
------------------------
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2010/08/lets-get-rid-of-this-goddamn-sim-how.html


Military personnel responsible for defending U.S. airspace had false tracks displayed on their radar screens throughout the entire duration of the 9/11 attacks, as part of the simulation for a training exercise being conducted that day. Technicians at NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) were still receiving the simulated radar information around the time the third attack, on the Pentagon, took place. Those at NORAD's operations center in Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado, were still receiving it several minutes after United Airlines Flight 93 apparently crashed in rural Pennsylvania.

No one has investigated why false tracks continued being injected onto NORAD radar screens long after the U.S. military was alerted to the real-world crisis taking place that morning. And yet we surely need to know more about these simulated "inputs" and what effect they had on the military's ability to respond to the 9/11 attacks.

NEADS TECHNICIANS TOLD TO TURN OFF 'SIM SWITCHES'
The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 took place in airspace that was the responsibility of NEADS, based in Rome, New York. NEADS was therefore responsible for trying to coordinate the military's response to the hijackings. And yet, in the middle of it all, at 9:30 a.m. that morning a member of staff on the NEADS operations floor complained about simulated material that was appearing on the NEADS radar screens. He said: "You know what, let's get rid of this goddamn sim. Turn your sim switches off. Let's get rid of that crap." <1> Four minutes later, Technical Sergeant Jeffrey Richmond gave an instruction to the NEADS surveillance technicians, "All surveillance, turn off your sim switches." (A "sim switch" presumably allows a technician to either display or turn off any simulated material on their radar screen.) <2>

This means that at least some of the radar scopes at NEADS were still displaying simulated information--presumably false tracks--57 minutes after an air traffic controller at the FAA's Boston Center called there and announced: "We have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York." Forty-eight minutes had passed since the first attack on the World Trade Center occurred, and 31 minutes since the second tower was hit and it became obvious that the U.S. was under attack. It was only three minutes after Richmond gave his instruction, at 9:37 a.m., that the Pentagon was struck in the third successful attack that morning. <3>

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. why a new investigation?
you seem to have put all of the pieces together.
take all your "evidence" to the families that lost someone.
once they sign on to your "theories", you will have a strong group that will have to be listened to by The PTB.
it should be easy to get the families on your side, right?
after all, your "evidence" is unimpeachable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "in their own words"
Edited on Sun Aug-15-10 01:19 PM by deconstruct911
Who do YOU think got kissinger to step down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The fact that he would have to disclose the names of...
Edited on Sun Aug-15-10 02:10 PM by SDuderstadt
the clients of his consulting firm, under the disclosure requirements and the vetting process.

And, it's simply not true that he had to "step down", as he never accepted the appointment to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. You asked
Its goofy to think that the job was not Kissinger's.

They asked, he said sure.

The families raised hell and he had to refuse the job, he defacto stepped down from a position he as good as had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. You need to learn to read, dude...
if you even know how and were to read the pubic law creating the 9/11 Commission, you would know that in order to avoid a conflict-of-interest, Kissinger would have had to disclose the names of the clients of his consulting firm. No one is saying the families did not play a role at all, but it's silly to claim it was solely or even significantly because of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. So
The people that the evil Kissinger worked for were so anti-American that he could not disclose their names? That's why he had to back out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Nevermind, dude...
you really ought to take a remedial reading class. Seriously.

I doubt a critical thinking class would be of much help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Remember?
There was a command and control aircraft in the skies that morning.

Forget the top general's name but he was 'on the way to Europe' that morning.
The flight he was on had all critical hardware onboard to control and command troops, flights, etc.

The general had a wide command of, and complete observations of, nearly all military air movements.

Too, there were AWACS planes in flight.

They had the whole thing planned very well. And they almost got away with it.

But now people know the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. hahahahahahaha
"They had the whole thing planned very well. And they almost got away with it.
But now people know the truth."

yes, thanks to you intrepid internet sleuths, they didn't get away with it.
reminds me of SCOOBY DOO "Curses, I would have gotten away with if it wasn't for those meddling kids!"
you guys should pool your resources and get a MYSTERY VAN.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. wow
Can you be anymore uncivil?

Keep digging. Of course Zappa would be ashamed, eh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Being civil doesn't require according goofy bullshit...
respect, dude.

I don't believe Frank Zappa would tolerate your goofy bullshit either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ok lets play
Edited on Sun Aug-15-10 02:27 PM by BeFree
Zappa would not like your goofy bullshit. He damn sure wouldn't tolerate it.

He was always for questioning authority in many ways, shapes and forms.

He suggested one feel and be free to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. he might also want evidence
You know what that is?
back to the point, now that they didn't get away with it, what happens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ah, good question
What happens now?

Powers That Be, PTB, will determine that up to and including the point where they drop the curtain.

In the meantime the evidence is being widely disbursed, as seen here in this thread. Evidence that I doubt you will even take the time to disprove.

PS. I bet wiki is being slammed by people looking up Frank Zappa, right about now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. uh huh
yes, the "evidence" has been sooooo widely disbursed.
you are just as much as an embarrassment to the democratic party as birthers are to the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'll play
You are an embarrassment to the democratic party as birthers are to the republicans.

I see you can't or won't even attempt to take on the issues posed in this thread.

Zappa would be embarrassed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. get busy "mysterying"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I'd love for you to point to...
my "goofy bullshit". Can you, dude? Or, are you too busy "disbursing" your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. you know the TRUTH!
Sweet...

Now could you please spell out what happened with details for the rest of us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't see any reference to False Electronic Hijacks in the link
adding a little personal spin to the story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Since hijacking exercises were being run on the morning of 9/11 by NORAD,
some of the electronic injects should have been "hijacked planes". Do you have evidence otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. It doesn't work that way
you made the assertion - you need to prove it. You can start by listing all the exercises and their purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. were these false tracks discussed at the 9/11 commission?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Just in case anyone....
buys into Spooked's goofy bullshit, here's what 911myths has to say about it:

http://www.911myths.com/html/operation_vigilant_guardian.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. that piece doesn't refute anything and leaves out other important info
that is in my link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Like what, dude?
Please be specific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
26.  NORAD Exercise a Year Before 9/11 Simulated a Pilot Crashing a Plane into a New York Skyscraper
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2010/07/norad-exercise-year-before-911.html


NORAD Exercise a Year Before 9/11 Simulated a Pilot Trying to Crash a Plane into a New York Skyscraper--The United Nation Headquarters
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC