Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9/11 - Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 01:11 PM
Original message
9/11 - Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!
VIDEO --

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&feature=related





Thought we should have this collection of video on the record here --



Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Soldier61 Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Please explain your LOL
Thanks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "total proof"
LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for posting this very important collection
It definitely has the potential to make humorous clip of the week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. apparently bin ladin had planted huge bombs in the basement
according to sources and yet the US govt denied this! Strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Of course
planting bombs in the basement was no longer an option since the FBI did that in 93.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "the FBI did that in 93."
any evidence to support this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wasn't that a time!! Amazing story .... !!!
... and the guy with the bomb in the rented truck comes back for his deposit!!

Also interesting how some "evidence" just seems to pop up -- like remnants of the

truck with ID numbers! Passports flying out of burning planes/buildings!

Last will and testament -- and flying instructions -- left in "hijackers" cars!

On and on -

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. *sigh*
In D & Ps world, only the government leaves evidence, not terrorists.
what a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Yup
I would want my deposit back too if the FBI stole my rental van!

And of course the evidence with one of a kind serial numbers was bound to come back soon. It was only buried under hundreds of tons of rubble.

But the OCT can say w.e. they want. The FBI & DA can say w.e. they want, because the official story says thats how they were found and thats simply a huge lie. Rahman's group was given safe houses for the bomb by the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #34
50. "Amazing" is the only word to describe how passports and bandanas and
and other "evidence" comes almost as if by magic carpet to the investigators!!

And just when they need it!!

Really liked the flying instructions for jets having been left in the parked car

of the alleged "hijackers" -- Oops!


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ryan_cats Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. Deposit?
... and the guy with the bomb in the rented truck comes back for his deposit!!

You do realize that he expected that there wasn't any way they'd be able to identify the truck AND that quickly. I know it sounds very convenient that they knew where the truck came from but it was pure luck. One of the responders saw what, I believe, was the mangled front axle and it had an ID tag on it that tracked back to the truck they used.

That or the NWO had the receipt and since they're a stickler for details; The perp didn't want the deposit to come out of his NWO check. I don't even want to go into travel receipts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. It wasn't PURE luck
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ryan_cats Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Interesting clip, lots of weasel words
That is an interesting clip.

However, did you notice the all the weasel words Dan the fraud Rather used? Remember W's TANG fax that was totally fabricated?

Now, there is some evidence that the FBI may have known of the plot in advance through an informant and might, might even have stopped the bomb that killed six people. And if my grandmother had b**ls she'd be my grandfather.

Another problem is that the attorney, William Kunstler (I probably shouldn't say anything bad about the dead).
Even some other civil rights lawyers regarded Kunstler as a "publicity hound and a hit-and-run lawyer" who "brings cases on Page 1 and the N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense Fund, Inc. wins them on Page 68."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Kunstler

Look at who he supports. It's not like his clients were Mother Theresa but he went out of his way to get on trials that had a lot of publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Emad Salem was the governments star witness in the trial
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 03:32 PM by deconstruct911
What stands out to me about Rathers is his connection to the CFR. He sits there and reads a script. Thats about it. And as for the bombing, we all have opinions, but my point was the official story is changed to hide ANY FBI involvement whether they had good intentions or bad intentions.


Personally I found this video interesting:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmcidzFa4hg
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e88_1192741655
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ryan_cats Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I'll look when I get home n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #37
52. FBI not only knew, they were assisting the plot, and paid for the bomb ...!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #37
57. Excuse me, but the Rather papers were real, only the copy was a forgery/fake, not the info. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ryan_cats Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. You know this to be true, how?
You know this to be true, how? I would love to see your proof because I have to hear about the Rather TANG report from my wingnut relative.

Much as I dislike bushII, he did qualify to fly a fighter plane, not something they let everyone do no matter how well connected. The speculation was that he was a cokehead so he failed his physical or didn't take it but what sucks is coke will be undetectable in only a few days of abstaining while pot which is relatively harmless stays in your system for up to over a month. So speed freaks and cokeheads can easily pass a drug test after only a few days while a pothead could potentially be hot for 30 days???? Plus, drug detection in the early seventies wasn't anything near what they have now. We know he was an alky but I thought the rule was 12 hours before wheels up or something like that???? So even if he was a lush, he would have passed his physical.

I also remember being shown a document that he actually did volunteer to go to Vietnam but his plane was being phased out so he was lucky or he knew that in advance, who knows???? I can't believe he thought he would ever be in the running for president so he tried to make it look like he was going to serve in a real war. Then again, I can't believe he became president, let alone twice; underachiever's everywhere, untie!

I hope your proof isn't from the following:
Rense.
ATS
CTC
If it's from CNN, great, if it's from Fox, even better! I'd love to be able to show that Fox proved Rather correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #35
51. Don't you usually need to return the TRUCK to get the deposit ... ????
Edited on Sun Dec-19-10 07:46 AM by defendandprotect
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
49. ... and paid for them, as well!! Amazing all that evidence which is simply ignored...!!!
Thanks for the reminder --

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Only if the CIA let him ....
hard to decide what part of 9/11 is the bigger joke --

Bin Laden or W Bush!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
terrafirma Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. YEAH!
Who needs a new investigation when news reports from THAT MORNING are obviously 100% accurate.

Funny how truthers post news clips from that day pointing to conspiracy when it suits their needs. I thought the media was in on it? Did they not get their script. In time?

PS - How could you hear anything over that ridiculous soundtrack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Which news clips do you rely on? Only the ones that fit the story you're comfortable with?
Some of the eyewitnesses to the Pentagon crash described a small jet, while others were very specific about it being a 757. Some of the military personel at the Pentagon described bomb blasts and smelling cordite....

One eyewitness for Flight 93 said he saw the plane coming over Indian Lake, losing parts and debris as it flew, yet the official flight path doesn't have 93 closer than about a mile and a half from Indian Lake, coming from the opposite direction (meaning it would have never passed over Indian Lake)...

There were many conflicting stories that day... how do you decide which to believe?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
terrafirma Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I don't rely on ANY news clips
Especially from that morning as there was confusion across the board.

I certainly wouldn't go ahead and tout news clips as TOTAL PROOF of anything. Eyewitnesses are known to conflict. That's why the official story doesn't rely on them. There's that pesky thing called physical evidence that truthers seem to come up short on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. "There's that pesky thing called physical evidence that truthers seem to come up short on."
Eyewitnesses in the Indian Lake Community called 9-1-1 and reported a plane flying low, dropping parts/debris on their houses and in their yards as it passed over. A man fishing in the lake said the plane flew over him. Physical evidence came from the lake and the adjacent neighborhood. The "official" flight path puts 93 at least a mile and a half or more coming in from the opposite direction of the lake, never crossing it.

You have physical evidence backing up eyewitness testimony, neither of which jibe with the official narrative. How do you reconcile that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
terrafirma Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. I remember hearing
Some of that. Who's the lone man? What was the evidence he found?

Serious questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. The fisherman was Jim Stop...
Edited on Mon Nov-22-10 11:53 PM by Ghost in the Machine
Meanwhile, investigators also are combing a second crime scene in nearby Indian Lake, where residents reported hearing the doomed jetliner flying over at a low altitude before "falling apart on their homes."

"People were calling in and reporting pieces of plane falling," a state trooper said.

Jim Stop reported he had seen the hijacked Boeing 757 fly over him as he was fishing. He said he could see parts falling from the plane.

As yet, there have been no official reports of any human remains recovered from the lake area.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_47536.html


"John Fleegle, an Indian Lake Marina employee, said FBI agents were skeptical of his reports about debris in the lake until they traveled to the lake shore Wednesday afternoon.

By Wednesday morning, crash debris began washing ashore at the marina. Fleegle said there was something that looked like a rib bone amid pieces of seats, small chunks of melted plastic and checks.

He said FBI agents who spent the afternoon patrolling the lake in rented boats eventually carted away a large garbage bag full of debris. "

http://www.flight93crash.com/flight93_secondary_debris_field.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yes. This is how I remember it as I WATCHED the
coverage on TV.

Thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Thanks -- and I think we are seeing too little of these kinds of collections .....
and I think we need to be reminded of what we saw that day --


:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
terrafirma Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. D&P...
I know you have me on ignore for my apparent disingenuousness, so maybe one of your pals can forward this question on to you.

Why are you posting this "total proof" on an internet forum instead of taking it to the authorities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. Carbomb exploded State Department - ABC Live on 9/11
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mrarundale Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. whatever happened to that anyway?
and there was also something about Camp David that disappearred...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I didn't know that...
Camp David disappeared. My, what an informative forum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Jeez dude
try and keep up.
remember we had to move our annual COMPANY BBQ last summer to that secret underground bunker in Kansas?
Oops, I probably said too much...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. There were several reports that Flt 93 had crashed at or near Camp David.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. there were?
can you find any of these?
or is it just another thing you "think I heard/saw"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Yes, there were...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. interesting
so, did it happen and was covered up or did CBS get it wrong?
what do you think is the most likely scenario?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Honestly? I'm not sure what I think about it yet...
... the info came from the FAA, according to the report... maybe they got confused and saw one of the planned war games blips that were supposedly inserted into the radar screens for the exercises.. I reckon I don't see much sense in trying to cover up a plane crash, but I haven't seen an explanation of *why* the FAA thought 93 crashed at Camp David. What information/data led them to release the disclosure to the FBI and then the media?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. not just the FAA
but also thru some FBI guy CBS claims to have talked to.
Obviously, a plane did not crash into Camp David, so it may very well be CBS jumping the gun to be first on the story.
there was a lot of bad reporting that day, which demonstrates how far journalism had fallen.
and is still falling...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. The video I linked to says that the FBI Official said he had been informed by the FAA..
.. he had not confirmed it himself, just going on the report from the FAA...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. right
but it sounds like CBS got their info from the FBI guy and not the FAA?
unless I missed it, did CBS confirm it with the FAA?
If not, shoddy journalism, but not surprising...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. right.... I understand what you're pointing out, though
I think everyone was just trying to get news out, most likely to keep public panic down. I'm sure CBS probably didn't verify it, they took the word of the FBI guy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. Shanksvilles PA *IS* near Camp David, for cryin' out loud!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #39
56. Yeah, around 120 miles away...
That's real close, huh? Like a double digit IQ makes you *close* to being a genius :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I wonder why we never hear about the "cover up" of the State Dept. carbomb on 9/11

You'd think that in the game of "make a collage out of conflicting early news reports" that this one would be a nice piece for someone to use.

Like, the whole affair was to cover up the assassination of someone at State with a car bomb, and that story was immediately buried by those guys who are always controlling news reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Resistance Radio Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
41. WTC7
Just out of interest, has anyone on this board explained WTC7's partial freefall collapse yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. a little late to the party?
there are many many threads that address the issue of WTC7.
have you tried looking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
k-robjoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
43. Kevin Ryan
In this clip, Kevin Ryan has some interesting points.

( The title given to the youtube clip, and the comment added, is totally misleading. )

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-XxRayFSeQ&feature=player_embedded

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
44. If everyone will notice....
////the replies by the so-called oct are about 99% insulting, disparaging, or sarcastic replies. If that doesn't wake your ass up, nothing will. Like I've tried to tell them time and time again, stop posting, and if they are right, the 9/11 conspiracy theory will die a natural death, but no, it seems they are determined to somehow, through demeaning comments convince "truthers" that they are full of shit, and will miraculously, "come to their senses". How much bullshit can people take? Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. makes sense!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Yeah...
...that rolling around laughing icon pretty much sums it up. Thanks for the affirmation.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. "How much bullshit can people take"?
And, here I thought your other post broke the irony meter.

So, should only "9/11 was an inside job" types be allowed to post here, dude?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #44
48.  Well, what I see is simply "ignored" -- and suggest you do the same ...
Edited on Sun Dec-19-10 07:41 AM by defendandprotect
If they had anything meaninful to say, they wouldn't be on "ignore" -- !!


:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. D&P "Logic"...
If you put enough people on ignore, eventually you won't have to debate anything with anybody.

I'd be interested in a show of hands of everyone who's NOT been placed on ignore by D&P. It can't be a very large cohort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #44
54. You are being laughed at and made fun of
because of idiotic threads like this and ignorant "videos" of "proof"

It's fucking hilarious to read the dungeon and see the crap people will believe. Some of you folks don't even believe we landed on the moon. If that doesn't wake your ass up, nothing will :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KDLarsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
55. Slowest ever demolition
Other people have done the research, so I'll just settle for linking it: http://www.911myths.com/index.php/A_WTC7_explosion_video

In short, the video was most likely shot some time between the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2, some 6-7 hours before the collapse of WTC7. Of course, depending on which video you're watching, you might enjoy some added in explosive sounds, subtitles putting words in the mouth of the firefighter, or a mix of the two.

In any case, this isn't the truth you're looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC