http://www.ae911truth.org/

[Stanchetalarooni]

TheTwin Towers' destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:

1.Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
http://www.ae911truth.org/

[SDuderstadt]

1. More bullshit

Where were the deafening explosions? Why didn't the clean-up effort yield a single piece of evidence of CD? Why doesn't a single controlled demolition expert agree with your claim?

[Stanchetalarooni]

2. 2.Improbable symmetry of debris distribution

[SDuderstadt]

3. "Truther logic"

straight down is the "path of greatest resistance".

Too funny.

[Stanchetalarooni]

4. 3.Extremely rapid onset of destruction

[zappaman]

5. Aren't you a little late to the party?

This has been thoroughly debunked many times over.
Try using the "search" function.

[mrarundale]

6. It's hard to tell

cuz the photos and videos are mostly so fake looking. But did they fall from planes? No way!

[zappaman]

7. "the photos and videos are mostly so fake looking."

What are your credentials when it comes to analyzing photographic evidence?

[Stanchetalarooni]

8. 4.Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes

http://www.ae911truth.org/

[SDuderstadt]

9. Lots of things in offices explode...

in office fires, dude. How many of those first responds are "9/11 was an inside job" proponents, dude?

A controlled demolition would have left telltale signs, NONE of which were observed, unless you cling to goofy superdupersecret thermite paint theories.

[Stanchetalarooni]

10. 4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint

http://www.ae911truth.org/

[SDuderstadt]

11. All one has to do is...

look at any aerial photo of the debris pile, as well as look at the pictures of damage to nearby buildings, to debunk this stupid "collapsed into its own footprint" myth.

[Stanchetalarooni]

12. 5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

http://www.ae911truth.org/index.php

[SDuderstadt]

13. There is no such thing as a...

"pyroclastic dust cloud", dude.

Another stupid myth.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyroclastic_flow?wasRedirected=true

[Stanchetalarooni]

14. Dust From Collapses Expanded to Many Times The Towers' Volumes

Another feature of the dust clouds was that they upwelled in immense columns, climbing to over the height of Building 7 (over 600 feet) in the seconds immediately after each collapse.

Such behavior clearly indicates the input of huge quantities of heat far in excess of what the friction of a gravity-driven collapse could produce.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/dust.html

[zappaman]

15. You must have accidentally overlooked my question....

"the photos and videos are mostly so fake looking."

What are your credentials when it comes to analyzing photographic evidence?

[OnTheOtherHand]

16. wrong poster, no?

I know it can be hard to keep track. :)

[zappaman]

17. oops

Yes, it sometimes gets hard to keep track off!

[SidDithers]

18. It's like whack-a-mole in here...nt

Sid

[jberryhill]

19. But the moles are impressive

[SDuderstadt]

20. Hey, I think...

Hugh Beaumont posts somewhere on DU.

Serious question: did he go from moles to beavers or vice-versa?

[Stanchetalarooni]

21. 6.Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking

http://www.ae911truth.org/

[SidDithers]

22. ROFL...

Richard Gage is an ass and a fraud. :rofl:

Sid

[zappaman]

23. yes, but

when you just discover him and have the inability to check his claims, you come to a democratic website and copy/paste his long debunked bullshit.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

24. Yes