UC Boulder Debate: WTC Natural Collapse or Controlled Demolition? - 9/11

[Stanchetalarooni]

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/459-uc-boulder-debate.html

BOULDER—The intense and controversial debate is set between the proponents of the “natural collapse” theory and the “controlled demolition” theory. Internationally acclaimed 9/11 speaker and architect Richard Gage, AIA, will present the evidence of the explosive destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11. The event will be held in Boulder at University of Colorado on Sunday, March 6 at 5:00 p.m. Gage will be representing more than 1,400 architects and engineers who question the official story of the collapse of these buildings on 9/11/2001 and are calling for a new independent investigation into the catastrophic events. Chris Mohr, an independent journalist and advocate of the “natural collapse” theory, will present evidence supporting the official account of collapse by fire.

Gage, a 23-year architect is a member of the American Institute for Architects and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). The organization cites evidence that the official FEMA and NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) reports provide incomplete and contradictory accounts of the towers’ destruction. AE911Truth points in particular to the destruction of the third skyscraper, World Trade Center 7, a 47-story building which was not hit by an aircraft, yet came down in pure free-fall acceleration for at least 100 feet—per NIST, and in the exact manner of a classic controlled demolition. The implications are startling. The group bases its conclusions solely on forensic evidence and does not speculate as to who may have planted the explosives.

AE911Truth’s conclusions are shared by thousands of scientists; senior-level military, intelligence and government officials; pilots and aviation professionals; firefighters; scholars and university professors; 9/11 survivors and their family members; and other professionals around the world

(www.patriotsquestion911.com, www.firefightersfor911truth.org, www.journalof911studies.com).

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/459-uc-boulder-debate.html

[SDuderstadt]

1. Gage does NOT have...

1400 architects and engineers signed onto his cause. That's why he sneaking refers to them as architectural and engineering "professionals".

[Stanchetalarooni]

2. Bring on the facts.

Go to the site and do some verification for us. Don't come back until you have the facts.

[SDuderstadt]

3. Dude...

have you ever even looked at the website?

In the section about the petition, it breaks it down into at least five categories: licensed architects, licensed engineers, architectural professionals, engineering professionals and a larger catch-all category. Add up the licensed architects and engineers and you find it's nowhere near 1400.

[Stanchetalarooni]

4. Sunday in Boulder.

Should be a great debate.

[LARED]

5. I took a quick estimate and came up with

around 200 max.

[zappaman]

6. So, how did it go?

I've been monitoring the media looking for breaking news that 9/11 was an inside job.
Nothing yet.
Gage probably kicked some ass, right?