Where have I seen this before?

[Nathan_Hale]

yeah, now I remember...

[spooked911]

1. Sssshhhh, don't tell anyone

but nukes were involved in both events

[Nathan_Hale]

2. Don't be ridiculous....

....we're looking at a Mythbusters Mentos experiment gone awry.

[zappaman]

3. Compelling evidence!

Don't ever change, man.
You are the best!

[SDuderstadt]

4. This is precisely why...

the 9/11 "truth movement" is going nowhere.

[zappaman]

6. DAMMIT, MAN!

"Sssshhhh, don't tell anyone"

YOU JUST TOLD THE WHOLE WORLD!!!!

Do you know what that means?
Mass panic, followed by a MAD-MAX type of existence where we fight for a glass of water or tank of gas!
You want that on your shoulders?!?!?!

DAMMIT!!!

[LARED]

7. Spooked, are you aware it is not possible for

a nuclear reactor to blow up like an atomic bomb?

[LARED]

10. So how were "nukes" involved in Japan? nt

[LARED]

17. So how were "nukes" involved in Japan? nt

[Stanchetalarooni]

5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/dust.html

Another feature of the dust clouds was that they upwelled in immense columns, climbing to over the height of Building 7 (over 600 feet) in the seconds immediately after each collapse.

Such behavior clearly indicates the input of huge quantities of heat far in excess of what the friction of a gravity-driven collapse could produce.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/dust.html

[hack89]

12. No - it indicates the release of huge quantities of energy

now - what was the PE of the WTC again?

[Bolo Boffin]

14. The term you are looking for is "density flow"

"pyroclastic-like" is quite unhelpful in looking for the truth of 9/11, because it implies 1) searing heat, 2) stunningly fast expansion, and 3) explosive origin of cloud. None of those factore were present here. This is finely powdered debris slowly expanding out of a collapsing building which produced not even the slightest first-degree burn.

Please check your prejudicial language at the door.

[SidDithers]

8. Japan has radiation. New York? Not so much...nt

Sid

[LARED]

16. Brussel sprouts????

Sorry. Brussel sprouts kick butt.

[defendandprotect]

9. kr

[Ohio Joe]

11. HOLY SHIT!

They have different colors, different sizes, different shapes, different make ups.... HOLY FUCKING SHIT, the exact same thing MUST have caused them!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.... or they are just completely different.

[Bolo Boffin]

13. Another example of using a still photograph to create a misleading impression.

Watching a video of the towers falling, it's very clear that while smoke from the hot fire went up (nothing unusual), dust and debris went only out and down. It's only as the buildings fell below that "out and down" line that it seems debris and dust traveled up first. It never did.

Comparison to another still picture of an actual explosion helps reinforce this illusion, but why is it that you must rely on illusions to press your case?

[hack89]

15. In your fevered imagination? nt