Anomalies Of 9/11 The dust

[Larry L. Burks]

I have just posted a snip. One on each four different posts on the dust to bring them up to the top of the list.

Now what I have to do is pull them all together. As one.

What they all have in common is the.

Damming tattletale evidence of the very large array, of the anomalies produces by the catalytics effects of curved space. A cold process

The tip off came at conference at Madison Wi.

When Dr. Judy Wood told Steve Johns how many tons of concert and steel of the Twin Towers had turned in to dust with in ten seconds. With the absent of any heat.

Dr Steve Jones reply was. The amount of energy needed to rip that many atoms apart a goes right off the charts and straight through the roof.

The very same thing was told to me by the same people that build this type of DEW. In Alamogordo NM.

The palm held DEW . What he was talking about was a laser that can be held in one hand.

What I was told was. The amount of energy that the laser can put out is much less than the energy it would take to do the damage that it does. Much less.

Why?

If you look at these DEW. The look a lot like a satellite dish. They use a concave mirror. The light shines on the concave mirror.

In turn the concave mirror focuses the energy to a point. A positive lens

They use hologram to change the positive lens action from the focal point of a positive lens in to the focal point of a negative lens.

Negative lens do not form a focal point. They form a tube of energy.

And here is my proof

You have seen the pictures of the planes over NY on 9/11

You have seen the pictures of these planes here.

http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=A429291&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf


I live out west. This is where they are testing this type of weapon system.

This is what they look like when in action

.http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4PRFA_enUS423&q=black+lines+in+the+sky



seen here


http://contrailscience.com/contrails-dark-lines-chemtrails/


http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001795.html


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRyZO6wXTjk&NR=1





The planes went into the ground? I don't think so.








look at the picture. You can see the aircraft. The jet. You can see the vapor trail behind it.

You can also see the black line in front of the jet. The black line is not forming a focal point that can be seen. The sides of the tube are parallel to one an other. It looks like a ribbon. 2D. But it rest in 3D of space. It is expressing it’s self as a tube. Energy in the form of a tube.

The tube is defined by energy. The tube is composed of the absence of energy. Like a bubble in water. If bubbles in water were black in their nature. You could call them a black hole

But if the bubbles in water expressed their self as a tube shape. You could call them worm holes.

What the tube in the picture is black is because it is defined or out lined. by this ocean of energy that we live in. But can not detect it. Strange Dark Energy or Missing Mass.

The tube it’s self is composed of the absents of energy. This is why it is seen as a black line in the sky

A wormhole.

Worm hole can curve space.

And in turn. Curved space can produce all of the abnormal evidence that we see .That of 9/11.

This 9/11 in a nut shell.

This is also why they refer to it as a free energy device.

The same scientist that are working on the technology of worm holes in order to curve space to the point that atoms are rip apart from other atoms. Turn object into dust. (9/11). To be used as a DEW.

Are also the same scientist that are working on the technology of worm holes in order to curve space to the point that you can manipulate gravity. The free energy device.

What truths is it that the Powers that Be are hiding from the American people?

9/11? Sure.

Why are they hiding the truth from the American people?

The free energy device.

The high coast of energy is there number one tool that they use to suppress the people. And have control and power over them

If the American people ever got their hand on this technology. Manipulate Gravity.

The suppressers would lose their money, power and control.

They stand to lose it all if the truth about 9/11 ever gets out there on the streets.

If I have posted my web page once. I have posted it a hundred time.

And not once has any body went there and read it. If they had they would know the same things that I do.

I’m sure that the people that clam that they are chemist and they have tested the dust. But they don’t know Jack about Curved Space. If they did. They would never be say what they are saying.

The only people that know how to build this type of DEW. Is the ones that are all ready building them.

I have yet to see one of these experts come on the net. And talk about what they are doing.

They don’t talk about. Presidents don’t talk about. Why. If you do. You are going to be doing some real long jail time.

The technology of worm holes and curved space.

It is an evidence that is like no other.

Curved space can produce the same evidence that very high temperature can produce. At room temperatures.

This is why I write.

I know that there are real people out there that are working on this technology.

I have talked to one.

I also know that if I stand up and speak out. It will make it much easier of others that willing, some day to follow me, to stand up and tell all.

The list of people that are willing to tell all is long. And it grows longer by the day.

They risked all and did it for me.

They did it for me.

I did it for them.

And so this is the way it is done.

This is my field of dreams. If I build it.

They will come.

http://www.ufoworkshop.0catch.com/


Larry L. Burks

[SDuderstadt]

1. Serious question:

Have you ever thought about using a ghost writer?

You know, someone who is actually knowledgeable about things like sentence structure, grammar, subject-verb agreement, spelling and punctuation?

[Larry L. Burks]

2. Spell right?

Sure. Want a job?

[SDuderstadt]

3. I'm not your guy...

dude.

I would only sign on to causes that are coherent.

[SDuderstadt]

7. Ask Ghost...

he appears to be one of your fans. Maybe he can decipher what you're babbling about.

[Ghost in the Machine]

6. Once again, you provide absolutely nothing to a discussion..

Is anyone surprised?

[jberryhill]

8. Was there a discussion to be had in response to the incoherent rambling OP?

[SDuderstadt]

9. Ghost is too busy bashing me...

to know how incoherent Larry's post is.

It has nothing to do with a "discussion", JB.

[Ghost in the Machine]

11. You were too busy bashing someones grammar and spelling to comment about the content of the post

This leaves the impression that you really have nothing substantial to offer in the way of a rebuttal. With your self professed superior intellect, it shouldn't be too hard for you to come up with a credible, coherent debunking of the OP, should it?

I've told you before, dude, I don't for one minute believe that you're a stupid man.. quite the opposite, in fact, but your caustic style turns a lot of people off, thus taking away from any credibility you may have. Give it a try sometime, ok?

[whatchamacallit]

12. Gotta disagree with one of those statements, Ghost

:hi:

[SDuderstadt]

16. Another of your many...

drive-bys, dude?

[whatchamacallit]

21. Nope, just taking issue with something Ghost said (nt)

[SDuderstadt]

23. With another...

drive-by.

Hmmm.

[SDuderstadt]

14. Maybe Ghost can translate for us and...

decipher what Larry is babbling about. Then he can tell us precisely why something that makes zero sense requires "debunking" to begin with. That is, if he wants to pretend what Larry is chattering about remotely makes sense. Of course, if one of us posted something so bizarre, Ghost would be all over it.

It's an astounding double standard.

[Ghost in the Machine]

19. "Of course, if one of us posted something so bizarre, Ghost would be all over it."

Please back up your assertion and provide a link to anything I've been "all over" in the past. You can't, because I usually just ignore them and try to let them sink without comment. Maybe you should try that sometime, too, instead of continuing to kick a post that makes no sense.

"It's an astounding double standard."

Speaking of astounding double standards, why aren't YOU all over ryan_cats' post below, berating his spelling and sentence structure? Start with the headline: "I topped here..", and end with "Is the NWO in the habit of producing documents that outline what would be a very secret weapon, where is the power course?" Shouldn't that start out with "If", and if not, shouldn't it be broken into two sentences/questions?

When can we expect you to be all over him. You're not a hypocrite who engages in double standards, are you??

[SDuderstadt]

20. Apparently...

Ghost is struggling to understand the meaning of the word "if" and, perhaps, believes it means "when".

That would be my guess.

[Ghost in the Machine]

22. What are you babbling about now?

Your reply makes absolutely no sense at all.

[zappaman]

24. forget the spelling

what the hell does the OP say?
how can it be debunked when no one knows what the premise is?
if you can figure it out, please please translate it for those of us who are baffled.
I'm not kidding...the guy down the street raving about mind control makes more sense than this OP and I would really like to know it's meaning.

[OnTheOtherHand]

25. +1

Truly, I found the OP bewildering, and I would think almost anyone would. By the time I finished, I laughed out loud at SDuderstadt's response, but not because sentence structure and the other things he mentioned really get at what is wrong with the OP. They just provide something to focus on. Then there are things like this:

"Curved space can produce all of the abnormal evidence that we see .That of 9/11."

Purists would complain about the sentence fragment, but that is pretty much perfectly clear, except that I don't have the foggiest idea what it means. And that's just (most of) one line. The OP reads like a mixture of Dr. Who, Dr. Bronner, and Allen Ginsberg. It's amazing. I can never get through it without laughing all over again. Then I imagine my daughter performing the text, and I laugh even harder.

[LARED]

26. I think this may be the final frontier of 9/11 CT-isms

A CT that is impossible to debunk.

Seriously, the fact that this post is actually incoherent to read, is simply a minor step up from some of the "less conventional" CT narratives that may be understandable to read but are nonetheless the creation of dark weaved imaginations creating incoherent and irrational stories that have been debunked for years.

[apocalypsehow]

28. What more is there to "add" to a vapid, rambling, fact-free post other than a spell-check?

:shrug:

Seriously: do you really see the least bit of coherent, in the vernacular-English sense, information or data from the OP? It is incoherence defined to its essence. And you're here calling for a "debunking" of it? Please. There is nary a usable sentence in that OP to build a platform of cogent reply upon: it's all rambling nonsense strung together by vague appeals to absolute credulity on the part of those reading it.

[Ghost in the Machine]

10. Well, for those who tout their critical thinking skills and their superior educations,

it shouldn't be to hard to figure things out, should it? I've always been of the mind that if all you have is commenting on someones spelling, you rally ain't got dick to begin with..

We're all probably guilty of it at one time or another, too. I know I've done it, but usually to some who I've seen bashing someone else's spelling, then make a mistake themselves.

[jberryhill]

27. It's not about spelling

If I am going to think critically about what someone says, then they are going to have to communicate something intelligible in the first place.

[apocalypsehow]

29. I sense a good deal of resentment towards those who actually know things - like historical facts and

such - radiating out of the toxic spew of the content of that post.

Sad.

[Stanchetalarooni]

17. Not in the least.

And he is quick, too. Steps right up to the plate and cf course claims to hit a home run every time...ha!

[SDuderstadt]

18. Says the guy now forced...

to backpedal on his claim about the signatories to Gage's petition.

[zappaman]

4. outstanding work as always, Larry!

Keep it up!

[Ohio Joe]

5. oh...

:wtf:

[spooked911]

13. one problem I have with Wood's work and this post is the idea that this has to be a cold process.

What is the basis for that? Why does it have to be cold?

[ryan_cats]

15. I topped here:

The tube is defined by energy. The tube is composed of the absence of energy. Like a bubble in water. If bubbles in water were black in their nature. You could call them a black hole

Are you serious? What about the immense gravity that is so powerful that even light can't escape? What about all the matter that is sucked in by its gravity? I don't doubt you're blowing bubbles in the bath tub and I've even got a good idea of their source but as for them being black holes, whatever their color, they're just bubbles.

The very same thing was told to me by the same people that build this type of DEW. In Alamogordo NM.
Are people with higher that top secret security clearances in that habit of talking to you, really?

It would be nice it you could manage to avoid using some physics terms you read about in 'graphic novels" as if you know what they mean.

I'm still waiting for one of your fellow travelers to explain how we can travel by magnets and manipulate gravity. His modesty must be the reason he doesn't want to collect his Nobel.

The very same thing was told to me by the same people that build this type of DEW. In Alamogordo NM.
The palm held DEW . What he was talking about was a laser that can be held in one hand.
What I was told was. The amount of energy that the laser can put out is much less than the energy it would take to do the damage that it does. Much less.
Why?
If you look at these DEW. The look a lot like a satellite dish. They use a concave mirror. The light shines on the concave mirror.
In turn the concave mirror focuses the energy to a point. A positive lens
They use hologram Really? to change the positive lens action from the focal point of a positive lens in to the focal point of a negative lens.
Negative lens do not form a focal point. They form a tube of energy.
And here is my proof
You have seen the pictures of the planes over NY on 9/11
You have seen the pictures of these planes here.

Do you even have an inkling of what you wrote means? Is the NWO in the habit of producing documents that outline what would be a very secret weapon, where is the power course? I certainly hope they're using green energy.

Oh yeah, you're using Dr. Judy Woods as one of your sources; need I say more?

[Larry L. Burks]

30. Green Sure. Judy Sure.

If you look on the front of DR. Judy Wood’s new book. She states that a Free Energy technology was demonstrated on 9/11.

What.

Are you psychic.

Did you read my other post about the blackness yet?

[mcollins]

31. Woah. nt

[Thunderstruck]

32. HOLY SHIT!!!

You got all of that out of the shadow of a jet contrail?

I have a friend who'd like to have some of what you're smokin'.

[Larry L. Burks]

33. Do you eat out of the same plate that you shit in?

If the blackness is some thing that is coming out of the front end of the jet. It can not be some thing that came out of the back end of the jet.

Do the math.