|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Jun-21-11 04:00 PM Original message |
Serious question for JFK assassination conspiracists |
Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BobbyBoring
![]() |
Tue Jun-21-11 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. Dude, The same thing it would take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Jun-21-11 05:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I already gave you one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BobbyBoring
![]() |
Wed Jun-22-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I'm missing something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Jun-22-11 02:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I debunked the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BobbyBoring
![]() |
Wed Jun-22-11 03:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Jun-22-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BobbyBoring
![]() |
Thu Jun-23-11 09:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Not so! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu Jun-23-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Oh, bullshit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BobbyBoring
![]() |
Thu Jun-23-11 11:29 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Try this then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu Jun-23-11 12:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Nathan_Hale
![]() |
Wed Jun-22-11 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. It would take a.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Nathan_Hale
![]() |
Wed Jun-22-11 05:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. forgot.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
k-robjoe
![]() |
Thu Jun-23-11 04:07 AM Response to Original message |
9. Something that struck me yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Thu Jun-23-11 06:35 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. A wild thought here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
k-robjoe
![]() |
Thu Jun-23-11 08:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. People might take cover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
k-robjoe
![]() |
Fri Jun-24-11 04:14 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. New link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JackRiddler
![]() |
Thu Jun-23-11 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. As an empiricist & not a "conspiracist," the question's not aimed for me, but just to play... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri Jun-24-11 12:39 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Thanks for admitting your lack of open-mindedness and the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ter
![]() |
Fri Jun-24-11 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
19. It would take Jesus Himself coming down and telling me LHO acted alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sat Jun-25-11 12:27 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
21. Dude-- you can't put the genie back in the bottle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 10:14 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Spooked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 10:25 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Baloney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 06:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
41. the case against LHO is solid because the govt supports that case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 07:11 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 06:38 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. "confused otherwise"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 11:25 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Nope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 01:10 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. I like your phone's translation, anyway. Seems more appropriate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 01:15 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. More bullshit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BobbyBoring
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 11:02 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. All 5 of those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 11:28 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Oh, please... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
23. actually, probably it would take what they did to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
25. LHO could have been a lone shooter and still be part of a conspiracy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. "much of which is still under wraps" = CTspeak for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Let's analyze some facts.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Please prove claim #3... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I never said that the CIA or the Mafia were directly responsible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:32 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. SDude is giving up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. No, dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Debunking your nonsense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I'm not sure what you are trying to debunk.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:41 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:57 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. ok fine, I'll take that as a compliment.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 05:02 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 07:21 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. Obviously my point is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 07:36 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 08:30 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. duplicate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 08:32 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 08:36 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Right.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #54 |
74. Both are shadowy groups |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Wed Jul-06-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #74 |
91. See "Blood Feud" Story line was..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Wed Jul-06-11 02:16 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. "Give us one good reason to believe the mafia didn't take out the Kennedy's." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Wed Jul-06-11 02:24 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Wed Jul-06-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. do you know anything about the evidence in the JFK case? Anything at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Wed Jul-06-11 02:38 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. How original!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Mon Jun-27-11 08:31 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. You are assuming that I believe that the CIA was behind the assassination... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Tue Jun-28-11 09:19 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. That's right... you wrote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 10:10 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Please see my post 31 above.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 01:17 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. What am I supposed to see in #31? Claim #3 in post #29 is bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 01:24 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Claim #3 included the word "likely".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 03:42 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. The HSCA did not reach the conclusion you claimed, "likely" or otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. They used the term "probably". From the conclusions.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Would you be happy if I restated my claim #3 as follows: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. No, you're still misrepresenting your own speculations as a conclusion of the HSCA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Whether or not the HSCA conclusion is itself doubtful is beside the point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 11:54 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Read what you quoted again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 01:24 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Do you realize? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 10:03 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Try reading it very slowly, several times (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 10:35 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Yep. Ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 10:36 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 10:38 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. From you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 05:19 PM Response to Reply #68 |
76. Sorry, but you are dead wrong about the HSCA... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 08:00 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Uh, that's exactly the "weak and inconclusive circumstantial evidence" I mentioned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 08:32 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. I'll give you 'inconclusive', but it is neither weak nor circumstantial... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 09:34 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Yes, it's both weak and circumstantial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sat Jul-02-11 03:00 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Once again you are assuming that I believe "the CIA" as a group was responsible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Sat Jul-02-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Once again my point had absolutely no such assumption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sun Jul-03-11 02:49 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. I strongly disagree, 'rogue elements' make all the difference in the world.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Sun Jul-03-11 08:13 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Well, at least now we're down to your opinions on what the HSCA should have concluded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Mon Jul-04-11 02:37 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. I stand by my revised statement way back in Post #65.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Tue Jul-05-11 12:13 AM Response to Reply #86 |
87. The HSCA "concluded" that they had NO idea who the alleged conspirators were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jul-05-11 01:15 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. Deleted message |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Tue Jul-05-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. Your statements are simply not true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Wed Jul-06-11 01:02 AM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Baloney! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Wed Jul-06-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #90 |
95. Right, and there's nothing I can find that supports your statement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Wed Jul-06-11 05:49 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Jeez, it's right here: "The committee is unable to identify the other gunman..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Thu Jul-07-11 02:43 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. I never said that the HSCA had any ideas about other gunman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Fri Jul-08-11 02:25 AM Response to Reply #98 |
99. The reason you can't provide the requested evidence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Fri Jul-08-11 02:37 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. There is direct and credible evidence.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
William Seger
![]() |
Fri Jul-08-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #100 |
104. I'm not interested in discussing your speculations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sat Jul-09-11 02:30 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. I'm simply pointing out the direct evidence that support my "speculations"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Sat Jul-09-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. You've heard of Disney World? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jul-09-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Deleted message |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sat Jul-09-11 05:22 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. What about "that memo" mentioned by Victor Marchetti in his Spotlight magazine article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. When do we get to see all the evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. If things keep going the way they are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeFree
![]() |
Sun Jun-26-11 04:44 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. True that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
56. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 01:57 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. The question was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Thu Jun-30-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. "The Joos Did It" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 12:51 PM Response to Reply #64 |
75. Is that a real... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
johnnie
![]() |
Fri Jul-01-11 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
79. LOL "Serious question" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Sat Jul-02-11 02:08 AM Response to Original message |
81. This thread doesn't matter. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JonLP24
![]() |
Fri Jul-08-11 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
101. Nothing. I know where the people on the grassy knoll are at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri Jul-08-11 04:30 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. Yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JonLP24
![]() |
Fri Jul-08-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. OK - that response is hard to work with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
johnnie
![]() |
Thu Jul-21-11 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
109. I don't quite understand the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Wed Aug-03-11 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
110. Yeah, DUDE, what do you mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Nostradammit
![]() |
Thu Aug-04-11 03:08 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. OOOOH! I wanna be there when you do it ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat May 10th 2025, 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC