Video: CBS Ch 2 News reports on 2 men caught with explosives at George Wash. Bridge on 9/11

[JohnyCanuck]

The initial report of the arrests of two suspects caught with a "truck load of explosives" at the GW Bridge also indicated that the authorities believed the two men were terrorists intent on blowing up the GW Bridge on 9/11, but as far as I know, we never heard any follow up afterwards in the mainstream media as to what happened to the suspects or any information as to whether or not they were part of the 9/11 conspiracy involving the Muslim hijackers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSekw4fT78Y&feature=player_embedded

[hack89]

1. It was corrected by Ch2 eight minutes later

All the gory details here:

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/A_truckload_of_explosives

[BeFree]

2. I remember that

One theory of the bombing of the towers is that after the planes hit and pandemonium ensued, trucks laden with explosives were driven into the parking garages.

Of course that would take suicide bombers to do such a thing.
Who could ever imagine such a thing?

[Ohio Joe]

3. Wow... Explosives in the basement that made the towers collapse from the top

Who believes stupid shit like this?

[zappaman]

4. stupid people believe stupid things

I doubt anyone here believes that nonsense.

[BeFree]

5. I don't believe your stupid shit!

The one tower's top was leaning over and then the bottom fell out.

The other two went straight down because the bottoms were blown away.

The videos don't lie.

Saw a pic of ground zero the other day for the first time. Building across the street was blackened up 10 stories and the glass was blown out. Sign of a street level explosion.

[Ohio Joe]

7. And now I know

Thanks!

I am certain you will show evidence of your claims... oh wait. :rofl:

[OnTheOtherHand]

9. the mind reels

If it were obvious from the videos that the Twin Towers collapsed from the bottom, wouldn't it be easier and more helpful to prove that point than to cuss you out a lot? :shrug:

[Ohio Joe]

10. One would think so

But BeFree seems to have a small issue backing up his bullshit.

[BeFree]

11. Joe asked:"Who believes stupid shit like this?"

And when speaking to people who use such language, it sometimes pays to go to their level.

Honestly, I try not to do that, but hey, I ain't perfect.

But I did stop myself from just replying to Joe, thusly: "More Goofy Bullshit from you, Joe"
Like what's his ass was wont to do. Bwahahaha

Did you see the montage of the ten or so different videos of the buildings collapsing from the bottom? I did. Maybe those who haven't seen those videos are the ones who don't believe?

[Ohio Joe]

13. And You will produce this evidence...

When?

[OnTheOtherHand]

16. pays in what sense?

If your object is to train people to associate the "truth movement" with inane flame wars, I think it's a great approach. If you actually think you know something about 9/11 that other people should know, I think it's bizarrely inappropriate.

Did you see the montage of the ten or so different videos of the buildings collapsing from the bottom?

You ask me that instead of posting a link to the montage? Again, that's bizarre. It's almost going out of your way to be unconvincing.

Maybe those who haven't seen those videos are the ones who don't believe?

:think:

Naw, that's crazy talk. I think you should just keep on throwing the F bomb. That's really turning things around!

[BeFree]

17. heh

Are you trying to make this forum about me? I really wish you wouldn't.

If you haven't seen the videos, you should. I don't have any links for you, but there are many in past posts. Heck, just google.

[Ohio Joe]

18. Yeah! Why should BeFree have to back up his bullshit?

He never has before, why should he start now?

[zappaman]

20. please link to the videos

why can't you?
uh oh...you didn't just make it up again, did you?

[LARED]

8. Why would it take suicide bombers

to drive trucks laden with explosives into the towers after the planes hit?

[BeFree]

12. Good point

It depends on whether the bombs were on a timer, or there was a button to push, or wired to be remotely detonated.

Surely the drivers knew that if caught they were dead, or they may not have known the time the bombs were to blow, so they would have most certainly been of the mind to be aware of possibly committing suicide.

Imagine driving a bomb laden truck into the towers, hoping you would get past security and knowing the buildings were coming down.

Could you imagine taking on such a task?

[LARED]

15. Those are some interesting theories

but providing any evidence the towers had bombs in the basement would improve them tremendously.

[jberryhill]

6. "but as far as I know, we never heard any follow up"

Don't know very far, do you?

[BeFree]

14. Maybe this truck chickened out?

If it was part of the conspiracy and they chickened out and were discovered, certainly being that it didn't follow the OCT, such a thing would have to be covered up. But like I say, I remember the report that day, along with the report of a bunch across the river who were reported to police as having a celebration as the towers exploded. Thanks, Johny, for remembering.

[zappaman]

19. maybe aliens took down the towers

maybe a truck chickened out.
maybe you have no evidence for all of your "maybes"?
maybe...LOL

[Ohio Joe]

21. Yay! The long debunked "dancing israelis" comes out of hiding again

At some point people might begin to call this anti-Semitic.

[OnTheOtherHand]

22. often it is -- but I don't think especially here

It looks like just another example of half-remembered factoids repurposed as revelations.

I tend to cut people some slack for whatever they remember of 9/11 news reports, because a lot of the reporting was seriously messed up, and a lot of us were pretty stressed out anyway. That isn't to say that I have any patience for people who try to pin the attacks on the Israelis. (ETA: As I remember or misremember it, there were some early reports about celebrating men, which didn't refer to nationality.)

[Ohio Joe]

23. Perhaps

I just tend to think that long time posters in this forum might be better acquainted with subject matter.

[OnTheOtherHand]

24. indeed... n/t

[defendandprotect]

25. kr