Judy Wood's "Where Did the Towers Go?" Book--

[spooked911]

So I got a copy of it, mostly out of curiosity what it looked like and to see whether there was anything more substantial in it then what I've heard in recent radio interviews with her.

Surprisingly, the book is an amazing presentation-- it is hardcover, beautifully put together. It is very impressive to look at, with very eye-catching maps and figures. I haven't read the book yet, but looking it over, most of it looks like straight-forward useful resource material on the WTC and the ground zero aftermath. She has some spin towards "directed free energy technology" spin and doesn't seem to promote "DEW" in this, and there is not even much of what could be called conspiracy theory, at least in the typical way that the 9/11 conspiracy is presented. She does have the Hutchison effect stuff, and the Hurricane Erin occurrence, both of which I think are bogus issues. Overlaid is all her original interpretation of the evidence, much of which I think is very wrong and/or misguided.

But the striking part of this was how good the book LOOKED. Also, it is heavy with beautiful maps and diagrams, which are bound to appeal to people interested in details of the scene.

I actually have no idea how she put this book together by herself, unless she was working non-stop for four years on it, but even then this seems WAY too professional for one person to do. She doesn't acknowledge any graphic artist that I can see. So something is weird here and this slickness indicates some serious backing from somewhere, for this book.

But the bottom line is that I have to give a recommendation for people to check this book out. If nothing else, it is the most comprehensive set of WTC and Ground Zero pics put in one place, with discussion of the construction of the towers, and surely interesting to people who want to know what happened to the towers. The first chapter gives the key proof that shows the official collapse story is bogus, though anyone with a brain and an open-mind can figure that out anyway. The main value is the visual impact of the book.

[zappaman]

1. So, it looks nice!

Fantastic!

"The first chapter gives the key proof that shows the official collapse story is bogus, though anyone with a brain and an open-mind can figure that out anyway."
Wow, I guess 99.9% of the planet has no brain or open mind, eh?
Thankfully, we have geniuses like Dr. Wood, Alex Jones, and yourself who try diligently, whether through nice-looking books or experiments with bunny cages, to educate us idiots.

[LARED]

2. Shiny book = Conspiracy

So something is weird here and this slickness indicates some serious backing from somewhere, for this book.

Spooked, you never fail to amaze.

[spooked911]

3. as usual, you either fail to grasp the key point

or you deliberately misconstrue my point.

[zappaman]

4. The key point seems to be how nice this book looks.

Isn't that special?

[spooked911]

6. nope, that wasn't it

please try again!

[LARED]

5. Perhaps I missed the key point

What was it?

[LARED]

7. Maybe this is the main point

The first chapter gives the key proof that shows the official collapse story is bogus

If yes, please provide a summary of this key proof.