blasted!

[wildbilln864]

footage of building 7 collapse :hi:

[wildbilln864]

1. This video .....

in the OP shows the windows being blown out right before the collapse of building 7.

[William Seger]

2. No, it doesn't

It indirectly shows the progressive vertical failure propagating upward, just as the NIST FEA model predicts. There is no rational reason to think the windows were broken by magical silent explosives.

[wildbilln864]

3. you're right!

"There is no rational reason to think the windows were broken by magical silent explosives."
That's true because there's no such thing as "magical silent explosives". But standard explosives and/or incendiaries could do the job. No magic required!

[zappaman]

4. Should be easy for you then

to provide audio proof for these explosions since the collapse was caught on numerous videos.

[wildbilln864]

6. Well....

I didn't take any video so no.
And it being faked to look like planes caused the collapse would require who ever to use the smallest charges needed to minimize any sounds of explosions. But many witnesses did indeed think they heard them.
But I'll look for some that maybe others have made and posted. Any video out there though was already screened and/or edited IMHO.
But listen here at about 37 seconds in...Keep your eye on that building.

[William Seger]

13. That video was shot around 2:30 in the afternoon

... not around 5:21, and it doesn't sound anything like a controlled demolition. And we've discussed many times how the firemen knew the building would probably fall.

Keep looking.

[wildbilln864]

7. and here...

explosive sound at 0:06

[William Seger]

12. That video was shot around 10:30 in the morning

We're looking for something around 5:21 in the afternoon, preferably one that sounds remotely similar to a large controlled demolition.

Keep looking.

[OnTheOtherHand]

5. how does that make any sense at all?

Are you proposing that carefully timed explosions blew out (some of) the windows sequentially from bottom to top?

Why? What's the advantage of using explosives on the upper floors?

[wildbilln864]

8. what's the advantage? you're joking right?

to make sure the whole building is demolished. No big chunks left, no floors left standing as in this example.

[OnTheOtherHand]

9. are you?

Are you seriously suggesting that the way to avoid a failed demolition is to set off explosives on practically every floor, but apparently just in one corner of the building?

I'm frankly kind of tired of trying to guess what people intend to argue.

[wildbilln864]

10. nope...

that's just the faulty way you interpret it!

"I'm frankly kind of tired of trying to guess what people intend to argue." Get some rest.

[OnTheOtherHand]

11. thanks for your concern, but an argument would be better

Do you seriously think the footage you posted looks like a controlled demolition? If so, why on earth? Don't you have anything at all?

[hack89]

14. Why would they be so concerned about big chunks being left over? nt