Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rutgers Law Review

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 05:58 PM
Original message
Rutgers Law Review
The Story of the FAA and NORAD Response to the September 11, 2001 Attacks

http://www.rutgerslawreview.com/

Transcripts, audio and lots more. I'm just starting to go through it and I imagine it will take some time.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I read the transcripts

But couldn't find the audio.

I guess I'll go look again, because I'd like to hear the voices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Audio here
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah...

Thats the transcript. I hadn't realized the audio clips were embedded in the report.

Amazing stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Want to see something else just as gripping
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vets74 Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. 9. THE IMPACT OF INACCURATE STATEMENTS -- an interesting section
This section presents the most important errors contained in statements from subsequent public information efforts.

-- Inaccurate Statement 1: The FAA notified the military at 9:16 that United 93 was hijacked.

-- Inaccurate Statement 2: The FAA notified the military of the hijacking of American 77 at 9:24.

-- Inaccurate Statement 3: The Langley fighters were scrambled in response to the FAA’s notification to the military, at 9:24, that American 77 was hijacked.

-- Inaccurate Statement 4: Military officials were tracking United 93 and intended to intercept the aircraft if it continued towards Washington, DC.


I found this compelling :::


Contrary to testimony before the Commission, the Langley fighters were ordered scrambled not because of United 93, which had not been hijacked, nor because of American 77, which had not yet been reported to NEADS, but because of the mistaken report that American 11 – the first hijacked plane – had not hit the World Trade Center, but was heading south towards Washington, DC. The fighters were ordered scrambled initially toward New York, and then vectored toward Baltimore, in an effort to intercept that mistakenly reported aircraft. The best evidence for both this false report and the resulting scramble is the subpoenaed NEADS tape, which records that at approximately 9:21....


FAA had run its efforts through a Security and Counterterrorism Committee begiknning back in the 1990s. This effort went through various renaming exercises over the years.

In any case, any and all tasking that would have coordinated hijacking information was avoided.

No central counterterrorism information center at FAA ??? Despite all that money spent in the 1990s ?

Who knew ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC