Thought I'd move this locked thread here...

[RBHam]

where it can die a dignified death.

is it just me, or has opinion on 911 lihop/mihop changed?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3090417#3091233

[demodewd]

1. MIHOP would have been easier

I don't see how they could have controlled it. LIHOP way easier to manage, by far.

I disagree with the above statement. MIHOP would have been easier to manage because the outcome would have so much more controlled.

All the outcomes with the possible exception of Flight 93 happened just as planned including the collapses.

How much of this would have been achieved by LIHOP?,starting with all the uncontrollable divergencies from successfully taking over the planes in the first place with just "boxcutters",successfully maneuvering these cumbersome planes to targets by commercial flight novices,having the buildings fall in their footprints etc.

[spooked911]

2. That is my thinking too. LIHOP is far too risky and unpredictable.

But there is too much evidence showing that they knew attacks were coming. So, it has to be LIHOP or MIHOP, but clearly there are problems with LIHOP.

This leaves MIHOP.

If you think MIHOP is unthinkable, try googling Northwoods. Also look up the polical philosophy of the noecons.

There is ample reason to think the worst of these people.

[demodewd]

4. kick

:kick:

[meppie-meppie not]

6. when you look at all the dirty, underhanded things the CIA have been

involved in throughout the world. The murder and mayhem that has resulted because of their handiwork, how they can and do rationalize their behaviour under the guise of "national interests". 3000 citizens dead is a drop in a bucket for them, IMO.

[Sterling]

3. Thx. I am sick of the suppression going on.

We are all adults. I think we can handle discussing this issue.

[seemslikeadream]

5. I wonder when it will be alright to talk about 9/11 in GD?

This is

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=3094323&mesg_id=3094323

[meppie-meppie not]

7. definitely! :-) n/t