Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whatever hit Pentagon seems to have had high radioactivity??? What does

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 09:53 PM
Original message
Whatever hit Pentagon seems to have had high radioactivity??? What does
that imply? Are there any other reports or evidence consistent with this report? Is there any regular radiation monitoring in the capital area and if so is the info available?

*********************
A geologist had her colleague go out on her balcony in D.C. with a Geiger counter -

interview by Iconoclast

snip>
MORET: I’ll tell you what I did when 9/11 happened. I called all the doctors with Radiation And Public Health Project, and I said, "Get out of town, and don’t come back until it has rained three times." One lived 12 miles downwind from the Pentagon. She went out on her balcony with her Geiger counter. I said, "Get that Geiger counter out of your purse." We had just done a press conference in San Francisco, and I knew she had it in her purse. Well, the radiation levels were 8-10 times higher than background. We called the EPA, HAZMAT, FBI, and said, "Get all those emergency response workers suited up. They need to be protected." Two days after 9/11, the EPA radiation expert for that region called back and said, "Yup, the Pentagon crash rubble was radioactive, and we believe it’s depleted uranium, but we’re not worried about that. It’s only harmful if it’s inhaled." He said, "We’re worried about the lead solder in the plane." Well, you know what’s in Tomahawk missiles? They have depleted uranium warheads. The radioactive crash rubble contaminated with DU is evidence of a DU warhead.
snip>

Entire article is chock full of extremely frightening info about Depleted Uranium
http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=6232
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting. According to an article I found, Boeing says it doesn't use
DU in Boeing 757's though it was used as a ballast in 747's.

DU is in armor piercing and bunker-busting missiles, and may support the idea that the Pentagon was hit by a missile.

Perhaps the A-3 skywarrior, a la Karl Schwarz, fired a DU-armor piercing missile...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The info on DU in the link is very frightening; WHO states that they
expect doubling of cancer rate and birth defects in world from U.S. use of DU in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia,etc.
and the author quoted says that those countries are unlivable and should be abandoned.
Anyone know another link discussing this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I know there are a lot of sites out there talking about the hazards of DU
just from using google last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Bunker buster warheads make small holes..
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 06:22 PM by hack89
the idea is to penetrate deep into the target and then explode. If a bunker buster hit the Pentagon, all you would see on the exterior facade would be a neat hole - not the extensive blast damage seen. The interior would be extensively damaged. Another problem is that most big bunker busters are gravity bombs dropped vertically from great altitude - a missile would have to be relatively small to be fired horizontally from a tactical aircraft. Missiles of this size have small warheads with explosive charges of 500 pounds or less - not big enough to create the damage seen.

And of course there is the minor issue of no one seeing an A3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. web search for pentagon radiation produced these results
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. How to check out the credibility of the report?
There seems to be mostly one main source here, who reports that she called a biologist who she knew had a geiger counter.
How to determine the name of the person who had the geiger counter?
and why hasn't she come forward to make a statement?

Why no followup on witnesses like this one?


Wouldn't there be radioactivity monitoring after what is said to be a terrorist attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Doe II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Check out this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. According to the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 04:26 PM by hack89
Tomahawk missiles do not have DU warheads (read half way down): http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=148
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC