Did anyone see this story over at Rawstory???

[babsbunny]

Former Bush Official says 911 story Bogus!!!! It is a UPI story and you can find it at www.rawstory.com. WOW!!!!

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

1. I always thought

the collapse of the buildings looked like controlled demolition.

[sharman]

4. No damn shit

As soon as it was pointed out, my eyes bugged out, omigod, no fucking way an airplane knocked those buildings down. Controlled demo, abso-fucking-lutely

[HysteryDiagnosis]

5. What was the life expectancy of the buildings.... what would it cost

to do any potential asbestos abatement, any rebuilding, any scaffolding, anything at all....

All buildings have a life expectancy.... after which, they must come down and or be rebuilt/repaired. It would be interesting to know how much longer they would have stood without the need to pour BILLIONS into maintaining them.

[ChiciB1]

2. AMAZING & WOW!!

Now all we need is for MSM to pick this up????

:crazy:

[Mass]

3. UPI being the original source, I would be very cautious about that

[applegrove]

6. Planned demolition by Osama. His #2 is an engineer. Engineers

all over the world looked at that tragedy in the days after and all said: "yup" aiming a plane lower in the building rather than at the top was exactly what would topple them". The first building hit was the last to fall as the plane hit much higher than the second attack. All it took was jet fuel & secondary fires to weaken the inside structure of the building. Then the 70th floor had 30 floors above it that were not load bearing properly. And then they fell. Then the first building fell after... because it has fewer floors above - less weight on the burning floor's structural beams..so it took a longer fire to make it all structurally unsound. This was at first jet fuel burning and then carpets, chairs, desks, etc. The few structural beams there were in the middle of the building (most of the structure was on the steel in the outside walls and the core) didn't have to bend. They just had to be heated to a point where a few beams could no longer hold up all the floors above.

Such a tragedy that day. So sorry the families have to keep hearing these stories. Think of the kids that lost a parent. They need to heal. Stories like this really don't help them very much. There is more than enough evidence that things were let slide because the FBI and terrorist people couldn't really imagine and internal high jacking. My pet goat proves much. Why it wasn't until Michael Moore explained it that we knew "my pet goat" took place after the second attack. There was much public information out there of planes & suicide terrorist - and we never put it together either.

What about all those people making cell phone calls to loved ones from the planes? Were they all lying to their loved ones?

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

7. don't think that controlled demolition means

that the planes weren't flown into the tower.

And no planes flew into Building 7, and yet I was watching television when it collapsed, and it looked like controlled demolition to me.

[HysteryDiagnosis]

10. What did Enron have to do with WTC7? Perhaps a little..... think

about it...

http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=219

*World Trade Center 7 fell to the ground after 5:30pm on September 11, 2001, over 7 hours after the first two buildings fell. It was not hit by an airplane or any major debris, and this is the only steel framed sky scraper in history said to "collapse" from fires - that has never happened since the inspection of sky scrapers. Watching the video footage of WTC 7 we see the building does not collapse, it implodes, and it does so right into it's own footprint without damaging the surrounding buildings. Demolition Experts call this a work of art - it was a controlled demolition. WTC 7 had a clandestine CIA bunker on the 23rd floor, and offices were occupied by the Department of Defense (DOD), INS (Immigration & Natural Services), the IRS (Internal Revenue System), as well as some of the banks involved in shady wire transactions to the supposed Arab terrorists involved in 9/11. Additionally, the SEC had much of its filings in WTC 7 - including Enron's SEC filings. WTC 7 was likely a central planning station for what really happened on 9/11.

[fooj]

8. Have you read David Griffin's 911 Omissions and Distortions?

You may view things differently...

peace.

[applegrove]

12. No - I'm very discerning about what I read. I'm capable of forming

my own opinions. I don't let anyone spoonfeed me their opinion. Just the facts mack. And I watched the news on that day. Enough information for me.

[fooj]

15. Why spoonfeed? Just credible info. Quite a bit, actually.

I'm a huge advocate of credible information, myself. Do you always make judgements based on assumptions?


peace.

[uppityperson]

9. Which #2 do you mean?

Osama's #3 changes, has several lives, 1 leg, schrapnel,or is that #2?

[Rainscents]

11. I knew this "There is NO F%@king Way, Plane brought down WTC

and building #7 and Building #11... Building #7 & 11 were never hit by the planes and it came down. If you see, movie "Confronting the Evidence: A call to Reopen the 9/11 Investigation" you can clear see, there's no way, building came down because of airplane. It was clear, building was brought down by demolition!

[stillcool]

13. Isn't it ironic....

you know that you know. You've done the reading, and while certainly inconclusive, you establish a certain logical sequence of events...for sanity's sake. One by one, these major here-to-fore undiscussed factoids concerning major events appear in 'mass media', and instead of dancing and shouting, it leaves you sadder than when it was under the radar. Because, what happens, is personalities take your well researched logical sequence and turn it into a discourse say on the word 'fix'. Or, what an 'historical document' implies. The bogus words spoken as fact only repeat the outrage felt over the previous silence.

[Bolo Boffin]

14. Poppies! Poppies....

...sprouting up all over the place.