Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could 9/11 have been prevented?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:09 PM
Original message
Poll question: Could 9/11 have been prevented?
Really overbroad question, so feel free to explain yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Abe Linkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. No more than the wars/invasions done & those planned
That's like asking if the murders of OJ's wife and Ron Goldman could have been prevented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Did OJ's wife
Edited on Thu Dec-18-03 10:01 PM by bowens43
receive over 30 warnings from intelligence agencies, some very specific that she was going to be attacked? Did OJs wife have a security briefing a few weeks before the murder in which she was given details as to how the attack would occur and who the attackers would be?

BUsh had no fewer then 30 warnings, several of which mentioned Al Qaeda and the possibility of using hijacked planes in an attack.

Bush had these things. He knew. Either he didn't believe it or he chose not to stop the attacks.

To compare the murder of OJs wife to the 911 attacks is silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. A comparison is never silly.
As long as these things are not equated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impe Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. In both cases


the perps got away with it. Unfortunately, in both cases, the glove did fit but the jury and the american people chose to believe in some unknown boogey man jumping out of bushes or planes as the case may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Question implies some things,
Edited on Fri Dec-19-03 07:05 AM by gandalf
especially that the attacks were not carried out from inside the US, on behalf of some establishment circles.
As nothing is proven concerning the complex 9/11 issue, this is this still a possibility (I know, this is "evil, foolish ... (please complete this list) conspiracy theory")
Your question seems to exclude this possibility.

edited for clarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Not exactly
...Unless you think that if forces within the U.S. government were involved, that precludes prevention by someone. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. By that token
if "nothing is proven concerning the complex 9/11 issue" and if therefore all theories are equally legitimate as you seem to imply, how come you aren't discussing the possibility that 9/11 might have been carried out by two visiting Japanese lab technicians surnamed Takashi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reorg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. the more pertinent question would be
in whose best interest these attacks were carried out.

Who gained from 9/11? I think the answer is clear for everyone, to some extent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Of course it could have been prevented
I don't see how anybody can responsibly say "no."

And you don't have to be a kook who believes that George Bush did it or knew about it or let it happen or whatever to say yes.

In fact, the really scary prospect is in fact "no" - that terrorists could infiltrate our society and kill thousands of us and there wasn't a damn thing we could ever have done to stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abe Linkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Relax. There's no need to worry about that.
You said: "no" - that terrorists could infiltrate our society and kill thousands of us and there wasn't a damn thing we could ever have done to stop them.

Just as there's no evidence (except phony, manufactured evidence) of WMD in Iraq, there's no evidence that OBL & his Boys Club are responsible for 9-11. It's far more likely that what happened is a home-grown, home sponsored insider job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowpie Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. and black helicopters are flying out of my posterior
Of course it could have been prevented. Unfortunately as a nation (not a political party or particular administration) we got too comfy and complacent about these things. We couldn't exactly shut down all aviation for an indefinite amount of time. Clinton had the same type of info, should we add him to our conspiracy list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abe Linkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Tell us how it could have been prevented.
Plenty of people say that if Bill Clinton had just been honest about his relationship with Mommica from the beginning, 9-11 wouldn't have happened. Is that what YOU had in mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowpie Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Clinton?
No that is not what I had in mind. I think Clinton's error was the same as Bush. They were in complacent administrations when it came to terrorism. I think Hillary made a good point when she said there was no real mandate to go after terrorists. Not until 9/11. If you are going to blame Bush and say he allowed this to happen you would have to assign blame to Clinton as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC