Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the extent of the White House/FAA phone connection; and

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:53 PM
Original message
What is the extent of the White House/FAA phone connection; and
what does that imply about 9/11 events?

The President has a large team that travels with him including secret service agents who maintain contact with the FAA, NMCC, NORAD, Cheney, Pentagon, etc. as needed for his protection.
After 9/11 Cheney on Meet the Press said that the Secret Service with the President had an open line with FAA after the plane hit the WTC.

Since the Secret Service was in contact with the FAA they were aware both that the plane had been hijacked and had hit the WTC before the President left the hotel for Booker School. And this was confirmed by a discussion between the president and Bush before departing.

This makes the President's actions and those of the Secret Service that whole morning very strange.

And during the visit while reading with the kids he was advised that another hijacked plane had hit WTC2. Yet he continued to read.

And statements issued later by the President's press secretary and by Bush were clearly not true about what he knew and when he knew it?

What does this imply?

Is there another source of info on the connections of the Secret Service with FAA, NMCC, etc. other than the Cheney quote?

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/01_31_02_911murder_sect3.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. There was big issue in 9/11 Comm. Report re: timeline of When FAA reported
the hijackings. But this seems to be a big smoke screen since the White House was in open contact witht he FAA from the first hijacking on; and likewise so were others like military NMCC, etc.

Laura Brown, FAA in charge of the first 2 hijackings says there was an open phone bridge at all times from fairly early on when they decided there had been hijacking.
And Cheney confirmed this on Meet the Press. Others like Richard Clarke, some reporters who were there, Mineta, Garvey(FAA) also confirmed this.

So isn't it clear that everyone knew what was going on with the hijackings very early on in the process?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Michael Ruppert: Obvious Bush & Secret Service knew of 9/11 Plans
Anyone disagree or have an explanation for the following?


Given the Secret Service's obligation to protect the President;

Given the Secret Service's open line to the FAA and therefore its knowledge that a plane had been hijacked and subsequently ploughed into the World Trade Center;

Given the potentially deadly threat to President Bush if he proceeded to a public place, on schedule, as announced the day before and known to everyone in the region;

There is only one explanation for the Secret Service allowing President Bush to take the deadly risk of going to the Booker School on the morning of September 11th.

George Walker Bush knew the plans for 9-11. And because he knew those plans, he knew that nobody was going to attack the Booker School

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/01_31_02_911murder_sect3.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC