Heavy viewing weekend: "9/11: In Plane Site" and "Confronting

[babylonsister]

The Evidence-A Call To Reopen the 9-11 Investigation", obtained for free by going to www.reopen911.org

Okay, for those who have been invested in this (and I'm believing more in MIHOP daily), I have a question. There're theories out there that the planes that hit the towers were not commerical aircraft. We've seen pictures of engines and plane parts in the debris left after the towers came down. Does anyone know if any of those serial numbers for the engines were ever examined to determine what planes the engine(s) belonged to? Apparently all major parts on an aircraft, especially those that are time controlled for maintenance isses, have serial numbers, such as landing gears and engines.
I can't imagine this has been overlooked, but am curious to know what the answer is. Thanks!

FYI 9/11: In Plane Site is a documentary by David vonKleist and worth viewing as is the other one (it's 3 hours long; very damning to this admin, mentions PNAC, has David Ray Griffin, etc. Worth going to their website to see if the VCD is still available. I ordered it months ago and just received it this weekend, so I guess many people jumped on this particular bandwagon. :evilgrin: )

[dbeach]

1. I think Karl B. Schwarz

had some info about the parts and numbers.he has a website and he often write for onlne journal

http://www.karlschwarz.com/

[babylonsister]

6. Thanks for this site, dbeach, and all the amazing

links it brings me to. Guess I'll have to do a lot of digging to find out what serial number(s) might have been uncovered and what airline they were assigned to. The very fact that the two videos I watched didn't address this has me wondering and maybe a tad skeptical about the non-commercial plane theory.

[MercutioATC]

2. Please, please, please, please STOP using VonKleist as a cite!

He's a complete charlatan.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=125&topic_id=31776

In particular, notice the 7:34 entry where VonKleist intentionally edits a witness statement to completely change its meaning.

..and that's only the first 15 minutes of the video...

[babylonsister]

5. I wasn't 'using' him as a site; he made the documentary

so I gave him credit, though I'm new to all this so wasn't aware he's a charlatan. Now I know; thanks.

[MercutioATC]

7. Sorry, that was meant as a general plea...

...it wasn't directed at you, specifically.

:hi:

[MrSammo1]

3. Since

there is no sign of jets at Shankville or the Pentagon.....I see no reason to believe the rest of the story.

http://69.28.73.17/thornarticles/911passengerlist.html

[dbeach]

4. could you elaborate on that site info..

or me send me some thing to my inbox

I heard that wing tv and alex jones were in a big fued.??

Intersting..why not more filing for compensation???