Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blueprints(?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
k-robjoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:24 AM
Original message
Blueprints(?)
Former Auxiliary NY Fireman Paul Isaac tells about his quest for the WTC blueprints :

"He said to his astonishment a complete set of structural floor plans was never released by the government supporting its conclusions. Instead, what he found were conclusions based without “the slightest bit of documented evidence.”

“So I went on a personal search all over the city, a search to every government and private office imaginable to get accurate data about the WTC building plans,” said Isaac. “Finally, in the old archives of the New York Fire Department, I hit the jack pot and now I think hold the trump card.

“I want to bring these documents to the public and I want to bring the culprits who caused this mass murder to justice. These blueprints have never been made public and it shows without question that the WTC is a whole lot stronger than the government would like us to believe. These blueprints show a very strong truss system and not a cardboard box like the government claims.”

The data, floor plans and schematics found by Isaac not only reveal the WTC structural design but give an inside look at every nook and cranny of the building, including designs of the 99 elevators in the two buildings as well as giving an impression of the building’s strengths and weaknesses from a fire department’s point of view."

http://www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com/articles/article/1518131/29736.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. "I want to bring these documents to the public"
Fantastic.

Where are they?

Why don't they say in the article how he has actually made them available to the public? Or to someone that will do an independent investigation?

Curious...
-Make7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Christophera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "I Want" V. "Need" and delivery to the public.
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 07:32 PM by Christophera
During peace marches a few years back, before the war ended and the crisis management peace team went home, the peace march leaders chanted/asked "What do we want?", the crowd chanted/answered back, "Peace. The march leaders, chanted/asked, "When do we want it?". The marchers chanted/answered, "Now."

I confronted the leaders loudly in sequence correcting their semantic weakness by yelling "What do we need?" Marchers liked this and escalated their response, "Peace". I chanted/asked, "When do we need it?" The marchers unified, smoothing their cadence, strengthening.

Semantic force depends on clarity and cunfusing wants with needs is very telling from a group, very, when it weakens a peace marchers, or the leadership of them demands for peace.

When we term or deem the WTC towers demise a "collapse" we do the same thing.

When a firefighter shows up 4 years later with blue prints that show "trusses" instead of "concrete core", and he "wants" to bring documents to the public, we have to wonder just how much this confusion really is just "confusion".

And consider this:

Delivery to the public means scanning and uploading images of the blueprints and a site map to server space. How hard is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Cool! I can't wait to hear more about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. You... must... believe... the... official... story
Don't try to think for yourself.

Don't listen to firemen who tell you:

  • The fires were fairly easy to bring into control;

  • The black boxes were found and recovered;

  • The sound of multiple explosions were heard;

  • The building was very well constructed.

Just turn on Fox News and bathe in the glow of manufactured reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Will they show that explosives were built into the buildings
from the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC