German engineers: Bush lied about 9/11

[MellowOne]

http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/defaulte.htm

German engineers tell what exactly happened on 911.

You have to go to the web page, can't be copied and pasted.

http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/defaulte.htm

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.-- George Orwell

It’s better to die on you feet, than to live on your knees – Emilio Zapata

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has. - - Margaret Mead

[spooked911]

1. It's an interesting site though I wouldn't say they tell "exactly" what

happened on 9/11.

[MellowOne]

2. I receive articles from yahoo groups through email

I post the articles about 9/11 here because they just might be of interest.

There is so much incriminating information on this du forum, I'm wish someone somewhere would blow the whistle.

[philb]

5. WTC2 top pulverized from below picture. What caused this?

The top section of WTC2 appears to have been destroyed before the rest of the building starts to collapse.

How could a pancake type collapse have destroyed the top section before the rest of the building starts to collapse?

[philb]

3. How do you fit a Boeing 757 through those 3 little holes?

Look at the 3 pictures labeled
WTC 2 3 Little Holes

Are these accurate and to scale? How did a Boeing fit through there? Was it mostly destroyed before partially entering the building? What went in and what stayed out?

Have people seen pictures on other sites to compare these to?



Firemen descriptions
http://www.flcv.com/wtcplane.html

[Kevin Fenton]

7. 767

The tower is 208 feet wide - much wider than a 767. The damage to the permieter is about what you would expect from a 767 - it's over a 100 feet long and you can clearly see where the engines and fuselage entered the building. Some of the parts of a plane (like the steel engines) are strong enough to break through the WTC's perimeter and some aren't (like the wing tips). It's no surprise that a lightweight aluminium wingtip (or tail) didn't sever a steel column.

[philb]

8. I don't disagree. But the shape seems a little strange. May have

been whipped a bit by forces. I think its possible the German's measurement estimates aren't very accurate. I'm not sure what they were based on. I tried to find how to contact them and ask some questions but didn't find their contact info.

[philb]

4. WTC6 explodes at the top picture; ?

It has been said that the smoke over WTC6 is from WTC2 collapsing.
But I've seen another picture where it looked like there was smoke at WTC6 before WTC2 collapsed. (see WTC2 collapses pictures)

In the German picture,

what caused the white cloud seen over WTC1? How could a lower level pancake collapse cause that?

When the cloud is first seen over WTC6, why is there no clouds/debris
to the left of WTC1?

From the picture where WTC2 collapsed, there was a rapid outward explosion of debris, clouds. If WTC2 has collapsed when the cloud over WTC6 starts, where is the debris cloud to the left of WTC1? Did the debris cloud all fall so rapidly that its no longer seen and there is no finely powdered residue cloud left even for a brief period?
Is this consistent with other pictures of WTC2 fall?

What part of WTC2 could have fallen on the center of WTC6 to make the deep hole? How could it fall just on the center of WTC6?

On a previous thread, there was a report that someone called the station that made the video of this that is widely distributed and confirmed that the WTC6 cloud was just before WTC2 collapsed.
Was this in error?

I didn't closely follow this before, but understood it had been determined that the cloud over WTC6 was debris cloud from WTC2,
but I didn't check it out and its not clear to me from these pictures and the other picture I saw of smoke coming from the base of WTC6 before I saw any smoke elsewhere.
What was in WTC6?

[philb]

6. WTC2- new explosions picture; what caused the new explosion below the

dust cloud?