Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ted Rall: The Legend of Flight 93

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:39 AM
Original message
Ted Rall: The Legend of Flight 93
The Legend of United Flight 93

by Ted Rall

...The legend of Flight 93 had everything a nation caught with its pants down needed to feel better about itself: guts, heroism, self-sacrifice. Best of all, it was marketable--by Hollywood and by a president willing to surf on a kind of heroism notably absent from his own life. (Theatrical release of the second "United 93" movie is scheduled to open April 28.) Lisa Beamer, widow of the passenger credited with the call-to-arms "let's roll," wrote a bestselling book by the same name, applied for a trademark on the expression, and is now working the Christianist lecture circuit.

Actually, the 9/11 Commission found, the evidence indicates that what Todd Beamer (or someone else) said was not "let's roll," but "roll it"--possibly referring to an airplane service cart the passengers may have wanted to use to break down the door into the cockpit. Too bad-. "Roll it" sounds less cinematic, and more like a book about cinematography.

The first indication that government officials were covering up the truth about United 93 came with their refusal to make public the cockpit voice recording (CVR). Releasing CVRs after a crash has long been standard practice; pilots' last, usually profane, utterances have become a cliché. Yet the FBI stonewalled victims' relatives for months after 9/11...

...Finally, after seven months of political pressure, the FBI allowed United 93 relatives to listen to the CVR. The feds told the families not to reveal what they'd heard. "They said the information on the tapes could be possibly used in the prosecution of Moussaoui, and anything that we say could affect the case in a negative way," said the brother of one of the victims...

continued at link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. why do you hate America?
Neil Young has a song called "Let's Roll" - It has to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I dislike that Neil Young song
it seems out of character for him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not really...
Remember in the 80's when he was all on the pro-Reagan tip?

I don't think he's that way about Bush, but it's not exactly out of character for him to react to things in a non-liberal or non-lefty way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I love Neil Young.
I have almost every recording he has done except for the exceedingly rare Mynah Birds single.

He never played "Let's Roll" last time I saw him, and was testing the water about ClearChannel and corporate media.

It would be nice to hear him say, "I wish I had never recorded that song."

Neil is signed to Reprise, which is owned by TIME Warner, so he's got his own corporate media issues. But Reprise lets him record whatever the hell he wants to, country, grunge, whatever...

Trivia: Booker T plays organ on Let's Roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. I like Ted Rall.
His cartoons are great and not only that, he is very articulate and intelligent. I loved the way he handled himself on "Hannity & punching bag Colmes" on F--k News.

I saw a lot of his stuff in the Seattle Press (Stranger, sometimes the Saturday P-I) but no media agency here in Spokane will touch his stuff. Too lefty or controversial. He has more balls than the whole news staff at CNN.



John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. kcik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Now that Zacarias Moussauoi has been convicted,..."
"Now that Zacarias Moussauoi has been convicted, where's that tape?"

Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. cell phones
I thought just the height was the issue, but the speed is the issue too? God, can we just have someone tell us the truth for once....

"Ever forgotten to turn off your cellphone during a flight? I have. Try it yourself: Cellular telephone calls tend to drop when you're driving at 60 miles per hour; passenger jets travel up to ten times that speed. Moreover, there's zero signal, and thus no ability to place a call, above 8,000 feet. Flight 93, en route from Newark to San Francisco at a cruising altitude of 35,000 feet, dropped 700 feet when it was hijacked at 9:28 am. Cell calls? Not likely. "

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kevin Fenton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Nobody will ever tell us the truth
Except maybe Winfield - I get the impression he feels bad about it.

Anyway, the distance from the ground (35,000 feet or whatever) is not the problem, because it's only, what, five and a half miles, which a cell phone can bridge easily (although many urban BTS are designed to send and receive signals only over shorter distances). The question is the orientation of the antenna which received the signals (it is claimed that they are generally angled down, which means that they shouldn't be able to recieve signals from planes). Seeing as we don't even know which BTS the calls were received by, we can't know what angle the antennae were, which is a big problem.

I'm not so sure about speed - I've made plenty of calls at 60 mph and never had any problems, but I use a different frequency and different technology - maybe the US is technically backward and has worse coverage than here in the second world - it wouldn't surprise me that much. In any case, the plane was doing about 400-500, not 600 mph.

The other thing is attenuation, i.e. mobile phone signals have trouble going through metal. So maybe a phone will work better on a plane if you are sitting by a window than if you have an aisle seat.

How charged a battery is apparently makes no difference (a phone knows how far it is from a BTS and transmits with the appropriate power), but older phones tend to be more powerful, so if the people on United 93 all had analogue phones, then it's really not surprising they got through.

Finally, Rall seems to think that the calls are faked and it was shot down. This is a fairly unique position, because just about everybody who things that the calls were faked thinks it was a false-flag operation, whereas the people in favour of a shoot down (myself included) think they were real (give or take the odd detail poorly remembered/enhanced by a grieving relative).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think it was probably shot down too.
Also, that the calls - at least some of them - were real. I thought the possibility of using cell phones in flight had been proven sufficiently.
Considering the speed at which radio signals travel, I can't imagine how several hundred miles an hour would affect a digital phone other than the issue of switching between towers.
Don't forget that GTE airphones are mentioned by Rall, but he inexplicably lets that point go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. several hundred miles an hour would affect a digital phone
The problem is that from high altitude, the signals reach more than one antenna at once,
and this can cause "cascading" and total disruption of the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. What about analog
as Fenton brought up?
What about the possibility that some of the calls weren't from cell phones, but were from the built-in air phones? That point alone negates the hell out of the "It's impossible that the calls happened" argument.

Also, there is no argument that cell phones are guaranteed to work at altitude and speed, only the evidence that they can work.

"several hundred miles an hour would affect a digital phone
The problem is that from high altitude, the signals reach more than one antenna at once,
and this can cause "cascading" and total disruption of the system."

I don't see an explanation anywhere yet that explains how cruising speeds make calls from personal analog, digital, or air phones impossible. There's this explanation that agrees with the second part of your statement that can disrupt calls on the ground (the system):

An FCC study in 2000 found that cell-phone use aboard aircraft increases the number of blocked or dropped calls on the ground. That's because at high altitude, cellular signals are spread across several base stations, preventing other callers within range of those base stations from using the same frequencies.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14290-2003Jun19?language=printer


If it's possible for them to work, this particular facet of the conspiracy theory should be totally abandoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kevin Fenton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I remember...
Edited on Fri Mar-10-06 06:27 AM by Kevin Fenton
... somebody once posted about there being some sort of disruption in Indian Lake(?) possibly caused by cascading.

I thought it was on JD2's "Cell phones and airphones" thread, which you can find here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x48029
However, although it contains some discussion of cascading, the discussion and link doesn't appear to be there.

Which thread was it on? Can you remember? It was by somebody who doesn't post very often (Borg maybe) and it was, like, post 6 on the thread.

I also thought that cell phone calls might get disconnected when the plane turned, but on second thoughts it probably depends what side of the plane people were sitting. CeeCee Lyles and Felt get disconnected at about the same time, but there are some other calls that appear to be still ongoing then. The times are only approximate anyway.

On edit: found this:
"Mobile telephones and satellite televisions in the Indian Lake area did not work at the time of the crash, he said."
On website banned by DU, so no link. Just google part of the quote in inverted commas to find where I got it from.

I'm sure there was another quote from a "reputable" source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. The disruption I remember was reported in "True Lies"
http://gnn.tv/articles/717/True_Lies


A guy first became aware of flight 93's approach when the lights dimmed in his building.

Later he attended some kind of conference out of state and was talking about his experience,
and someone who claimed to be ex-Air Force said the light dimming was due to some kind of
electromagnetic target fixing or avionics disruption that would precede a missile attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I guess speed matters because
the phones goes in and out of frequencies, and, yeah, the antenna aren't pointed "up".
I never thought of the contradiction of beliefs on 93, it is the strangest seeming because of our familiarity with the passengers (or so we think) and events, even though it's probably not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. when Mossaoui has been tried etc are they going to release tapes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Speaking of Moussaoui...
I heard his defense was going to be that the FBI knew more than he did, (so how can he be tried for not preventing it?) He is such an obvious scapegoat , It makes me sick. The defense tried to get Curt Weldon to talk (because of his Able Danger knowledge), but he doesn't want to help a "thug" like Moussaoui, and is trying to get out of it.
It sure would be nice if the defense got some good information out there, but I'm programmed to expect constant disappointment in terms of justice in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. He's already plead guilty, right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. The judge told him to "think about it for a week"nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSammo1 Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. I hope the new movie
is as good as the A&E movie was!

the more attention the lie gets........the better!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. We need to respond to the movie, hit the exiting audiences
with leaflets a DVDs.

We need to get ready for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSammo1 Donating Member (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. That's a great idea.
It started wearing T-shirts on the subject of 911 about six months ago. You'd be amazed at the number of people that have come up to we and said, "You know about it?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC