Ghost Gun UA175, version 3.2

[spooked911]

an amazingly comprehensive analysis of the video plane that hit the south tower:
http://dialspace.dial.pipex.com/prod/dialspace/town/pipexdsl/q/aqrf00/ggua175/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Holograms, Whistle Blowers and the 911 Media Hoax"

"Conclusion

Having looked over films and photographs of the UA175 aircraft and considered Boeing 767-200 performance issues I can safely say that the UA175 aircraft was not a production model Boeing 767-200 manufactured in Seattle or any other kind of conventional aircraft. After studying the witness reports it would appear that the real WTC2 strike operation consisted of 2 elements:

Element 1 - The Airborne Illusion

According to the witness reports an aircraft of some sort was seen to collide with, and subsequently vanish inside of, the WTC2 tower. This is a physical impossibility for a real aeroplane. The effect could have been achieved by some sort of airborne illusion that would fool witnesses into believing a real aircraft had collided with the WTC2 tower.

Element 2 - The Media Hoax

There is sufficient evidence contained in this article to identify the second element of the WTC2 operation which is the media hoax. One of the purposes of this media hoax was to provide specific images of a United Airlines Boeing 767-200 collide with and vanish inside the WTC2 tower and perhaps conceal any visual weaknesses of the existing optical illusion. The UA175 aircraft may have been added to the film during transmission or after transmission / reproduction to cover the absence of any aircraft or to conceal an aircraft that was not a Boeing 767-200. The UA175 aircraft may have been added any given photograph to cover the absence of any aircraft or to conceal an aircraft that was not a Boeing 767-200.

The reason for this "two pronged" modus operandi would have been because while planning the 911 atrocities the Perpetrators realised that flying a real jet into the WTC2 tower was not going cause enough damage to publicly justify the collapse of the structure using the 'burning jet fuel' theory. As the Perpetrators needed 911 and the eyes of the world were going to be focused on the Trade Towers something that looked believably like a Boeing 767-200 had to be deployed and seen to be flying into the tower. The only choice was to use some form of hi-tech optical illusion to fool the masses into thinking that a real jet had hit WTC2 and then use pre-planed explosives to create believable structural damage and a impressive pyrotechnic display.

The problem was that the Perpetrators couldn't get the optical illusion to look 100% realistic so in order to conceal this weakness they used a media hoax to 'plug the gap' and leave the masses with believable live footage and/or pre-fabricated/modified footage of the event.

This media hoax element however, was not 100% successful for 3 reasons. Firstly, the witness reports didn't add up. Some did see something that resembled a passenger jet flying into WTC2 but couldn't positively identify it as a Boeing 767-200 with a United Airlines livery. Secondly, someone or some group inside the media fabrication operation blew the whistle by producing defective fakes that could easily be discerned from the legitimate fakes and then mixed them in with the remaining media. Under close scrutiny these deliberate fakes can be exposed, but to the layman they remain invisible. Thirdly, some of the fake film and photographs were not of a sufficient quality and could be detected by a discerning eye or the process of photographic analysis."