Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dan Rather and WTC7 - explained as planned demolition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
simonm Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 12:21 AM
Original message
Dan Rather and WTC7 - explained as planned demolition
Edited on Tue Mar-21-06 01:06 AM by simonm
Dan Rather admitted building 7 was a planned demolition on TV.

How much more evidence does one need to consider the WTC demolition theory as a possibility? It requires much more than 7 hours to plan and place charges for a demolition.

Video:

http://www.infowars.com/video/clips/news/010506_rather_wtc7.htm


Edit: Please disregard this post. It was a misinterpretation from faulty audio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh brother.
He did no such thing.

What do you think, people won't watch the video?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
simonm Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. SORRY. my mistake.
Edited on Tue Mar-21-06 01:04 AM by simonm
"reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.”


Had to look up the text. The audio wasn't clear for me. Please disregard. My mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Snark retracted.
Sorry, jumped too soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I NEVER thought I would agree with you BMUS, but all Dan Rather
said was he thought it looked like a demolition. If LIHOP or MIHOP is real, there is no way in hell Dan Rather knew anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm sure we can agree on a lot of things.
Methods may differ but the goal is clear.

I want my country back.

And so do you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. So you retract ... "They" got to you ehhhh? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC