Beautiful new Pentagon site

[mirandapriestly]

I think it's new, it's really nice. I don't know "who" made it, but lots of good information, pics, a chronology and no agenda that I can see, except to get 911 investigated properly and who wouldn't want that?

What do you guys think?

http://www.pentagonresearch.com/

Here is an excerpt-

I have no comprehensive theory of my own or any dramatic conclusions. The goal of this site is to present as many observations of physical evidence as possible. My hope is that by having an additional research tool other researchers will find something that assists in their hypothesis. If we keep supporting each other like this then I believe there will eventually be a discovery at a level where something official really can be done.

I know some of the observations here support the "official" story. I can only say I've been diligent and honest in my approach. Whatever I found is what I found. I considered both the official story and the alternative theories every step of the way. I believe if we quit arguing over red flags and straw men amongst each other then we will collectively discover what really happened. It may be very different than any one of the "camps" may believe happened. But by staying in our camp and wasting energy defending our personal beliefs we will only minimize our effect and our goal. Following is a summary of my thoughts.

I believe that at the very least, elements of the U.S. Government allowed and assisted in the four events of 9/11. There was pre-9/11 intelligence suppressed and ignored. There was a giant and inexplicable hole in our defense system on the whole eastern seaboard for the exact time that it took the events to unfold.

[Grateful for Hope]

1. I liked what I saw

I haven't read the entire site, but, from what I did see, it appears that the author is trying very hard to be as objective as possible, and some of the questions raised such as:

"There are significant photos and eyewitness statements that indicate aircraft debris outside and inside the pentagon. There is much less debris in size and quantity than one would intuitively expect from an aircraft the size of a 757-200. Some of the debris can be specifically identified with a 757 aircraft.

I believe that the physical damage to the pentagon is anomalous in many respects. There are serious violations of physics that need to be explained, the exit hole being one example. It may be that there are explanations for these but in a total void of truthful information from our government we don't know what they are. Voids of this nature will be filled in by a culture of people hungry to know the facts. Some attempts to fill the void may at first be inaccurate, but after being challenged and reconsidered in an open community I believe understanding this is possible. I myself will persist in this direction. ANY person reading this that can fill any existing void in information is welcome to participate in this website with credit or anonymity.


There are direct contradictions and irreconcilable variants in the evidence made available. This forces investigators to make choices that always leave some other aspect of the evidence hard to accept or omitted altogether. This may be disinformation intended to deceive. Some series of events did occur to result in the collective body of physical and eyewitness data available. Persistence and logic are the only tools we have short of somebody coming forward to understand the details of what happened. I believe the stakes are so high that we may have to wait for a "death bed" confession.


I find it as hard to believe that an untrained, Cessna 172 unqualified hijacker could fly a 757 with that precision as I do a remote control aircraft theory. The remote control theory leaves me with 64 passengers missing but it explains why not one passenger seat is evident in the nearly 2000 photos I have inspected both inside and outside the pentagon. I am forced to choose one. This is the type of dilemma I refer to above."

Thank you for sharing this with us.

[Kevin Fenton]

2. It's not really new

It's been around for at least a year. Here's the WayBack machine results:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.pentagonresearch.com

It is very good though, especially the photos.

[mirandapriestly]

3. Foiled again, oh well, it's new to me

and it is really good I think.

[Desertrose]

4. new to me too...and thanks for the heads up ....n/t

[Name removed]

5. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.