Found the best video debunking 9/11. Loose Change. watch it

[reprobate]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose+change">It'll really piss you off.

[buddysmellgood]

1. Not found. Can you check the link?

[seabeyond]

2. cant get it either n/t

[bbernardini]

3. There's an extra http in there. Here's the correct link:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose+change

[flyarm]

4. try this link.............

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2023320890224991194&q=loose+change

[Joe Fields]

5. Already did. Watched it a second time, and then....

sat with my wife to watch it. Chilling, shocking, amazing. Of course freepers like my brother will scornfully dismiss it.

[OmmmSweetOmmm]

6. It's an excellent video, and I have passed it forward often. K&R!

[Dying Eagle]

7. I am in shock!!!

I have seen some of this evidence before, but not like this. I am scared to death right now.......

I have no idea what to even say....

[MrSammo1]

24. I have no idea what to even say....

Just keep asking questions an spreading the word!
That's all we can do!


http://69.28.73.17/thornarticles/911passengerlist.html

"Because I don't want my grandchildren pissing on my grave!"
< retired Lieutenant Colonel Robert M. Bowman on why he joined the Scholars For 911 Truth>

[bronco2121]

8. reason why it pisses you off...

the reason why it pisses you off is because the whole production is designed to be emotionally provocative. that's its substance - not the content, which promotes every debunked 9/11 theory out there (missile pods, giant duck flying into the pentagon, etc).

loose change is little more than a music video trying to attract more people into the 'movement' - however, once in, these new skeptics are going to spend the next 2 1/2 years looking at the same old pentagon pictures going, 'ooh ooh that IS a small hole...' and showing their friends the WTC video of the missile pods firing. meanwhile, any chance of proving 9/11 was an inside job is slipping away.

b.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20040810075752147

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

9. Release the Pentagon surveillance videos.

Problem solved.

[MrSammo1]

25. Release the Pentagon surveillance videos.

They can't release......what don't exist!

[Kevin Fenton]

18. I agree completely

But the music is good and they did ditch the pods in the second edition. Maybe by the 10th edition it will be halfway accurate.

[Loose Nuke]

10. Much better info available than Loose Change

Try "9/11 Guilt" Don Paul/Jim Hoffman, "Perspective on 9/11" Ken Jenkins, "Great Conspiracy" Barrie Zwicker, "9/11 Inside Job" Jim Marrs and any of David Ray Griffin's speaking engagments and 9/11 International Citizens Inquiry and any of the other DVDs and books available from http://www.911truth.org/store/911truthstore.htm

If you don't have time to read David Ray Griffin's books, especially 9/11 Independent Commission Report: Ommissions and Distortions, check out the summary at
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404

for downloads and streams of lots of great, credible stuff damning to the official story and proving the need for a new investigation, visit
http://www.911busters.com

Get the truth out! Give these videos to your friends and family and send them to the real sites
http://www.911truth.org/index.php?topic=resources
http://www.911truth.org/links.php

[Chiyo-chichi]

11. Thanks.

Just watched David Ray Griffin's Santa Rosa talk at http://www.911busters.com. It was outstanding.

[Loose Nuke]

12. Yeah, Griffin is awesome

He's so mild mannered and speaks simply, but what he says just destroys the lies and liberates minds.

[pberq]

14. I second that - Prof. Griffin is a hero

of the 9/11 truth movement. I've just gone back to "9/11 Commission Report - Ommissions and Distortions"

[BlackHeart]

13. Questions I have on the Loose Change video

1. at the beginning they quote a Fox reporter as saying "it didn't look like it belonged in the area"
well duh, what plane belonged in that area? Nothing but a traffic copter.

2. blurry photo showing 'missile launch'. So it was planes full of fuel, missiles and a building full of demolition that brought down the towers. Well they had their bases covered. Why would it have been necessary to launch a missile just before impact? Wouldn't it have made more sense to pack the plane with high explosives? And if that is a missile that we see impacting the building why don't we see the missiles engines launch first?

3. "an extra piece of equipment is visible" This has been well debunked and the author must know he's spreading BS, which makes the rest of his story hard to believe. Pod-

[BlackHeart]

15. I'm surprised no response yet...

another question. At the end of the video of Loose Change I they claim that many of the hijackers are still alive. Wouldn't this be pretty easy to prove. Why hasn't either side of this debate done that?

[Kevin Fenton]

19. Hijackers still alive

Several of the originally suspected hijackers are still alive (or, in the case of Ameer Bukhari, had been dead for a year before 9/11), but the FBI either removed them from the list (for example Adnan Bukhari) or found somebody with the same or a similar name who seemed to be dead (for example Waleed Alshehri). It's kind of hard to piece the muscle hijackers together, because there is really not much information about them available in English and nobody in the "9/11 truth movement" speaks Arabic and can get info from the Saudi papers. The biggest problem is maybe Salem Alhazmi, but we'll see.

[cyberpj]

17. I'm interested too. Can you tell me where the info is that disproves

the "extra equipment" claim?

[BlackHeart]

21. The bottom of this plane

(that I posted) looks just like the one on the conspiracy website.

[cyberpj]

22. "This has been well debunked "

OK. But from what you wrote I thought you had multiple sources with statements about it. Well debunked usually means lots of people have published disputes. I was just curious to see some.

[BlackHeart]

23. Compare my picture

to what is shown on the Loose Change video. I found my picture from a Google search, but Popular Mechanics is who I recall debunking it.

[MrSammo1]

26. The whole "pod" thingie........

is a red herring. There's no reason to go there.

There is plenty of verifiable evidence without it. The WTC and Building 7 Demolitions, the missing evidence of of the Pentagon and Shanksville crashes, and the ever shape shirting Osama bin Laden are enough to sink the neocon ship.

[CB_Brooklyn]

16. recommended

Loose Change 2nd Ed: an excellent video

[Gabi Hayes]

20. what about this?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6545313046180631815

how does one explain the instantaneous pancaking of every floor, allowing the buildings to collapse at the speed of the acceleration of gravity?

I have no dog in this hunt; RB Ham pointed out this video. I've only seen about twenty minutes of it; have it paused right now

I don't think I WANT to believe anything but the CW at this point, at least, but what's true is true, and, as usual, I don't know what to think

thanks for the info on Loose Change; I haven't been able to make it all the way through that