|
and the same guests were on the whole time; plus an additional guest who I am unfamiliar with (Vinny somebody?) was on for a bit at the end. The two guests on for the whole 2 hours I listened where the couple from WING TV, who also wrote the book mentioned above. I'm not sure if they were also on the first hour.
I haven't read their book; but I've seen their website and heard them briefly on another radio show. They are obviously very passionate and dedicated about exposing 9/11 truth; but I really wish someone of a more scientific background had been on instead. The host, to his credit I think, was very determined to keep politics out of the discussion. As a result and also since I believe the show is based out of New York City, most of the discussion centered around the collapse of the WTC buildings.
The WING TV couple, however, were clearly only able to discuss the scientific matters in terms of what they've memorized from other people's scientific studies within the truth movement. Don't get me wrong, they were well-versed and did better than I could do on such topics. It's just that the more scientific it got, the more uncomfortable they sounded.
It may be true that alot of the truth movement scientists aren't doing media (I know Dr. Jones, in particular, is avoiding it in an agreement with his employer, BYU). But I have heard Jeff King, an MIT Engineer, for example, on a radio show speaking to controlled demolition. I would hope there would be others actively making themselves available.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
