|
As most of you are aware, yesterday the media broke the story that President Bush authorized the leak of classified information by Scooter Libby to Judith Miller of the New York Times. This suggests that Prosecutor Fitzgerald has been relentlessly following his investigation up the chain of command, and as all prosecutors have a tendency to do, expanding the scope of his investigation.
Is it possible that Fitzgerald, having access for far more information than we could dream of possessing, including hours of sworn testimony of the highest officials in the White House, would not have come across evidence of LIHOP/MIHOP if that evidence existed? And if he did, wouldn't he have expanded the investigation?
This suggests one of several possibilities:
1. There is no evidence of LIHOP/MIHOP to be had from the White House senior staff.
2. Senior white house staff have been able to maintain their silence about 9/11 even as their resistance to talking on the record about Plamegate has crumbled.
3. Fitzgerald has uncovered 9/11 evidence but he is strictly and rigidly staying within his original mandate to investigate the leak of classified information and nothing else.
4. Fitzgerald has uncovered 9/11 evidence, but he is part of the Washington consensus that even if one knows that 9/11 was an inside job, it is just too destabilizing to bring it into the open.
Just wondering what your views are.
|