flying debris or "high powered lasers?" please tell me !!

[DemInDistress]

http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem3/flashindex.php

More laser evidence. The first 2 clips shows a single laser floating around. Not so spectacular ... but it's there. The third video has a lot of visible lasers.
From "911.wtc.2.fire.laser.3.abc.avi". Enlarge your videoscreen ... and the lasers should be obvious. Admitted, the video quality isn't the best. (If you have the sequence in a higher resolution. then mail it : )
In this sequence there is at least 10 laser beams. Small local fires seems to start right after a laser leaves the area. Take a look at laser closest to the center. Right after the laser leaves its stationary position (and the camera zooms out) smoke and fire is pouring out of the spot.
The purpose af the lasers seems to be ignite fires. The evolution of the fires in the towers shows that they were very resistent. And the perps knew it.
The lasers could also be used to cut up steel beams, but that isn't visible ...
Below some (low q) samples from the video. See "next" page for more (al-Q : ) lasers.


its late and I am tired so adios for now my fellow 911 hunters. see you again tomorrow.

DEM

[mirandapriestly]

1. You mean this one?

http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtcfire1/newlaser.php

I don't really see the lasers on the video that you linked to.

[DemInDistress]

3. try this one..

911.wtc.2.fire.laser.3.1.wmv see the rest at http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtcfire1/

no doubt its some type of laser and not flying debris as it may appear.

[file83]

15. Check out these hand held lasers....

...can you imagine what kinds of lasers the military has?

These things can burn through plastics, lite matches...
http://www.wickedlasers.com/videos.php

Very weird stuff.

[Jazz2006]

2. Can you perhaps explain what you mean by "laser" in that query?

What does a "laser" look like?

Laser surgery?

Laser dermography?

Laser eye treatment?

Star Trek type lasers?

If you could narrow down what it is you're asking, that would be useful in formulating a response.

From your post: "single laser" "visible laser" (as opposed to invisible ones?), "laser beams", "laser", "lasers designed to start fires", "lasers to be used to cut up steel beams but it's not visible"


Ummmm ~ do you have any idea about what it is you're proposing here?

Just wondering.

[DemInDistress]

4. what kind of lasers do our fearless jet jocks use when they

fire laser guided missiles? In the vids I posted it appears to be flying debris. However that is not to say
lasers weren't used at the WTC on 911. see the link above in reply to miranda.

[BlackHeart]

5. So it was...

remote controlled airplanes, filled with fuel, firing missiles into the building just before crashing, along with the demolition charges that were set in the weeks prior to 9/11 AND lasers aimed at the building that brought it down? Did I cover everything? Are you sure that the aliens that we captured at Roswell weren't working in cahoots with the magic beings from the Bermuda Triangle?

[dailykoff]

6. Speaking of magic

you forgot the fertilizer.

[SidDithers]

8. Fuel oil and fertilizer were used too?...

I thought it was thermite.

Sid

[Chomp]

9. You left out

the thermo-nuclear device in the basement.

[Christophera]

7. Conservative To Limit Marginalization 'Cause Laser Won't Explain Free Fall

To commit to fringe possibilities (note I do consider it a possibility, albeit remote) that the flashes are lasers, is a further fetched concept that DOES NOT help explain free fall, so it is not worth the marginalization believing such causes for the flashes.

Endeavor to find explanations for free fall, numero uno.

I found my explanation.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

[DemInDistress]

13. lasers wouldn't bring down the towers,,explosives would.

It was just a video displayed at terrorize.dk that caught my interest. Could high powered lasers ignite
thermite? For sure. Did they? Don't really know. My best evidence is playing at Eyewitness to 911.com
the sounds of those massive explosions going off prior to each collapse changed my opinion from LIHOP to
MIHOP. Not to forget the blatant cover up by the BUSH CRIME FAMILY and LARRY SILVERSTEIN/MOSSAD.
Were they working in tandem? H'm inquiring minds want to know.
Thanks Chris for the link.

[OmmmSweetOmmm]

10. Didn't a couple of eyewitnesses in the firemen and first responder

transcripts talk about missiles being sent off of the top of the Woolworth building into the WTC?

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=9%2F11+transcripts+missiles+woolworth+building&ei=UTF-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&fr=moz2

[mirandapriestly]

14. yeah, and you can see lots of activity from the WW bldg here

in this vid as well as some other pretty interesting stuff.
http://www.bodyatomic.com/vid/QT_big/WTC_big.mov

[rman]

11. debris, (sheets of paper?) i think -

i've seen video that shows an entire 'flock' of 'laser beam spots' that appears to move more or less in synchrony in the same direction. It just didn't make much sense to me - untill it hit me: it's something like sheets of paper drifting down wind.

for the record: i'm firmly MIHOP.

[Wexus]

12. I find this to be a very distracting theory.

1.Why would they be used as the building is falling?
2. Why would be they at an exterior point when we've been told that the exterior walls form a structure web that you can poke holes through with harming the integrity of the building.
3. If it were a laser, It would instantly poke a hole through the outer wall and you wouldn't see it anymore.
4. If it were a laser, wouldn't you see enough dust and smoke in the air to make the laser visible like at a rock concert?
5. I don't think there are white lasers as this would mean that it would be full spectrum.

[mirandapriestly]

18. It isn't a "theory"

there are lights that look like laser lights with no apparent explanation.

[rman]

21. Bright white colored thingies

moving about, mostly from right to left and down somewhat - same direction as the smoke.

That's what i observe.

There are a number of possible explanations for that observation.

One is laser beams reflecting off the structure of the building, another is sheets of paper carried by the wind, reflecting sunlight.
The position of the sun at the time left that side of the building only just in shadow, while illuminating smoke and debris in front of the wall - that explains the high contrast between the "lights" and the wall.

[DoYouEverWonder]

24. It could just be artifacts

in the images. Digital images do that. Especially since someone pushed the reds in most of the samples.

[DemInDistress]

19. distracting theory..did I say lasers brought down the wtc? also

since your new here with 6 posts I'd say you need to show me (us at DU) some "bona fides" otherwise you'll be grouped in with greyl,hack,LARED and a couple other 911 debunker's.. or DISRUPTOR'S
so show us your credentials.

thanks

[greyl]

22. I can't take you a bit seriously any longer.

It just doesn't make sense that someone believes everything you've posted.

Btw, I'm proud to be mentioned along with hack and Lared. They are examples of the rational thinking and education that Democrats champion.

[Jazz2006]

23. I can't imagine anyone taking anything DiD says seriously given his/her

posts here. I suspect that he or she is a Repug troll here for the sole purpose of trying to make rational people think that he or she actually represents Dem views.

There's a word for that.

[DemInDistress]

25. rotf !!! nt

[Jazz2006]

16. Not only distracting....

but also complete and utter crap. There is nothing in the link from the OP that supports the ridiculous suppositions made in the opening post, nor those that follow it viz a viz lasers or flashies and such.

Whacko theories like this only detract from the real questions that should be asked about Sept. 11/01 when the gov't fell down on so many fronts. This kind of stuff only helps the Bush administration by keeping people talking about nonsensical conspiracy theories instead of focussing on how badly the gov't failed that day.

[Name removed]

17. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Jazz2006]

20. Such rapier wit; such depth of thought and analysis.

I am humbled by your obvious superior intellect.

That must have taken you quite some time to come up with "you don't know that or any thing (sic) else creep".

Stellar.

Absolutely stellar.