where's the airplane??

[shanti]

check out this video i got in my mail today. it's supposedly been pulled from several sites. it breaks down the pentagon crash story very well!

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main

(can anybody mirror this?)

[Redstone]

1. Oh, fuck me, not AGAIN!

Redstone

[shanti]

4. take a chill pill, dude

jesus christ... :eyes:

[Richard Steele]

2. Disappearing from GD in 5.... 4.... 3....

[pola]

3. THANKS for posting this !!!!!

It's about time this is getting out... I have been reading this stuff for 2 years now.
Glad it is finally getting out in the open.

[Mz Pip]

5. In reality

a whole lot of it was found.

DNA was found on the victims and there were many witnesses to the crash.

Whatever.

Mz Pip
:dem:

[trotsky]

7. Quiet, you!

How dare you interrupt this fine conspiracy thread with FACTS?!? ;-)

[libertypirate]

16. I am doing research do you have a link?

Not likely, I keep asking but no one ever points to actual evidence... Or are you talking like you know, but you really don't..

Thanks in advance

[Make7]

17. Here are some links that might help with your research:

Google Search=dna identified "flight 77" site:911research.wtc7.net

Google Search=eyewitness "flight 77" site:911research.wtc7.net

No need to thank me.

:) Make7

[Xithras]

6. How many times does this need to be debunked? n/t?

[Redstone]

8. Apparently not enough times. See #4.

Redstone

[Solomon]

12. It has never been debunked.

[MrMonk]

9. Impressive

they've found witnesses who can accurately describe something that they briefly saw by comparing it to something that they've never seen. I'm convinced.

:sarcasm: (added for benefit of the literally-minded).

[hack89]

11. So what does this say about the witnesses who heard ...

explosions at the WTC? How many people have heard real demo charges in real life? They are describing something they briefly heard by comparing it to something they have never heard.

[MrMonk]

15. It raises a question as to whether their reports were reliable.

[gonefishing]

10. Ok maybe I'm not that smart...

If flight 77 didn't wind up there where did it and it's 64 pasangers go?

That’s a signpost up ahead: your next stop: The Twilight Zone.

[Solomon]

13. Oh that's a great reason to believe the official lie. "It must have flown

into the Pentagon because where else could it be".

I am continually amazed by the people whom can't believe there own eyes. That wall on the Pentagon did not collapse until twenty minutes after impact. The freaking wall that the "plane" hit was still intact as firemen were dousing it with water.

Now you can see that with your own eyes. But somehow, the crime is so horrible you can't wrap your minds around the fact that not only was the wall still standing, no burning of the ground, and no plane debris, but you are willing to believe a couple of "witnesses" who said they thought it was a 757 while dismissing a couple of "witnesses" who said it was a missile.

[shanti]

14. thank you, solomon

i've always respected your postings - i like your open mind. apparently, this topic is like waving a red cape to many du'ers;) now i know...

you're right about people not being able to wrap their minds around this. it's the same as the wtc. cognitive dissonance. i don't usually post threads on these type of issues, but this british video seems pretty comprehensive. the fact that it is being forwarded to me by people who don't normally do so is proof to me that some of this is sinking into the collective psyche.

and that's a good thing.

peace