Watch this quick, it may be pulled ..NO plane at Pentegan. WATch>>>>

[greenbriar]

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main

[LA lady]

1. hmmm

Sorry, I lost a secretary friend at the Pentagon and KNOW people who saw the jet.

We are all entitled to our own opinion but I can't go with this.

[kentuck]

2. And all those people they had funerals for..?

Who killed them? Must have been a conspriacy?

[titoresque]

4. alot of very credible

people investigating these accusations right now. Theres so much info. that refutes the official story.

[peacetalksforall]

3. Something went on there, but a commercial jet did not make the hole

if you do the math (take measurements). Taking the measurements is the least a non-scientist can do to realize that there is something fishy there.

[Warren Stupidity]

5. So where is the plane then?

Before this goes to the mihop graveyard, where the heck did the real plane go? I'm willing to believe that the pentagon was hit by something else, but what happened to the plane?

[kentuck]

7. Are they hiding those folks on a deserted island someplace?

And whose funerals did the family attend? And how did those people die? But we measured the hole??? BS! As if an aluminum can would make a hole the same size as the can. Answer the questions about the missing people and the funerals before anything else.

[rman]

16. Us not knowing exactly what did happen does not lend credibility

to the Official Story.
The people who were in the supposed plane can have been killed in any number of ways, in that case the family of those people attended the funerals of those people who were killed.

In the past the government has planned false-flag operations involving American victims. See Operation Northwoods:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwood

Operation Northwoods or Northwoods was the code name for various false flag actions, including domestic terror attacks (such as involving the use of "hijacked" planes) on U.S. soil, proposed in 1962 by senior U.S. Department of Defense leaders to generate U.S. public support for military action against Cuba.

<snip>

In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations, Cuba Project (Col. Edward Lansdale), the document lists methods (with, in some cases, outline plans) the author believed would garner public and international support for US military intervention in Cuba. These are staged attacks purporting to be of Cuban origin, with a number of them having real casualties. Central to the plan was the use of "friendly Cubans" —right-wing Cuban exiles seeking to oust Fidel Castro and establish an anti-communist state —perhaps similar to the earlier Batista regime.

The suggestions included:

<snip>

- Destroying an unmanned drone masquerading as a commercial aircraft supposedly full of "college students off on a holiday". This proposal was the one supported by the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

<more>

[savemefromdumbya]

14. there was no plane

sorry to disappoint

[meisje]

6. Pulled by the moderators maybe!

[TheWraith]

8. Actually, that's been around for quite awhile. It remains crap.

A lot of completely false claims mixed with bad science, supposition, and paranoia.

[LA lady]

10. think about November

And the kind of stuff that will hurt us in the election. I have yet to meet one person in real life that believes these theories.

[clydefrand]

9. Back up plan?

If it was a missle that hit, then this was a backup in case the real plane didn't make it on time.
(eg. the one that went down in PA.). I still think 9/11 was instigated by the present administration, probably with Ben Laden's backing, detail planning. The admin. needed a reason to
go into Afganistan and then follow up with the real reason being to convince the world we should be in Iraq.

[LARED]

11. May be pulled?

This nonsense has be posted here on a regular basis for at least a year.

[Desertrose]

12. OK...so according to the logic of the "official story"

the plane at the Pentagon didn't have enough fuel make a huge gaping hole, melt the building (demolish in the case of reinforced concrete)....or even mess up the lawn immediately in front, where it was supposedly flying 530 mph 2 feet above the ground (ask any pilot if THAT is possible)....

BUT the jet(s) that hit each tower had enough fuel to melt steel , render the towers unstable and cause their collapse within minutes.....

REALLY??

....and as far as what would they do with the passengers who supposedly died on the flight...do you honestly think our gov't or whoever, would have any problems whatsoever in killing/silencing/disappearing anyone who would cause problems for the official story??

Logically...there are some huge leaps one has to make to believe the whole 9-11 fiction.

[AlienSpaceBat]

13. That flash animation has been around for ages ...

Why do you say it may be pulled ?

Sit down, get your breath back, and calm down !!

[DemInDistress]

15. no doubt flight 77 DID NOT crash into the Pentagon but what did

??? THE SMELL OF CORDITE WAS HEAVY IN THE AIR. Also, blow back from those engines would have sent those spools
clear across the highway. Additionally, windows above the crash site are still intact. How can that be? Must be the "GODS"....
STILL,911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !!!

[SidDithers]

17. Didn't you already do this post once?...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=83781&mesg_id=83781

Sid

[iconoclastNYC]

18. "It may be pulled!" LOL

I don't think the Pentagon questions are that credible. The WTC questions are much more compelling.