Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flight 77 terrorists ignore much easier target of opportunity, Whitehouse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:09 PM
Original message
Flight 77 terrorists ignore much easier target of opportunity, Whitehouse
They fly amazingly close to the Whitehouse yet bypass it only to pull off an incredibly difficult 270-degree maneuver to hit the Pentagon. In an area that is under construction. While pulling off that maneuver the aircraft would have been vulnerable to retaliation from air defense missile batteries on the ground. Doesn't the Pentagon have such defenses? Or did I hear that they were dismantled previous to 9/11/01?

Anyway, why hit the Pentagon? The Whitehouse makes a much better target of opportunity. Hitting the Whitehouse makes much more sense symbolically even if you inflict less or no casualties(excepting the onboard passengers). One might say that this is proof the Flight 93 was going to hit the Whitehouse and the terrorists were merely "on task". I disagree, in a "hodge-podge" operation such as this, a terrorist attack where there are several independent entities acting in concert yet unable to communicate with one another, each team goes for the biggest "prize". Once that target has been eliminated then subsequent teams move on to other various targets.

The Whitehouse or the U.S. Capitol are much better targets yet they chose a target that is less important, the Pentagon. Plus there are various better targets of opportunity within blocks of the Whitehouse: the U.S. Capitol, the World Bank, the IMF, the Watergate Complex or the State Department.

So why the Pentagon? The planners(PNACers, Cheney) needed the outward appearance of multiple targets and multiple threats. With the concentration of the destruction happening in New York they needed to create the appearance that the nation's capital was also under attack. But they didn't want to actually destroy any buildings in the process. The Pentagon is that target as a direct hit to the Whitehouse would likely destroy the entire complex. Plus it provides them with deniability, who would dare attack themselves or blow up their own buildings?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sgsmith Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Play with Google maps
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=washington,+dc&t=k&om=1&ll=38.886757,-77.044373&spn=0.057857,0.1684

Look at the comparative size of the White House verses the Pentagon. Which is larger? Which is easier to see from a distance? Heck, even the Capital isn't very big when compared to the Pentagon. And somone could use the Mall as a nice virtual arrow pointing to the Capital, but they didn't.

I'm bewildered by one thing. If so many people here say the hijackers weren't competent to fly a simple Cessna in VFR conditions, how is it that those same incompetent pilots were supposed to find a building enclosed in a forest?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC