posted by VCambri, at Today, 12:04 PM on Kerry/Edwards forum
http://forum.johnkerry.com/index.php?showtopic=99216&hl=As a Software Architect with 18 years experience and an Adjunct Professor of Computer Science I want to warn the Kerry campaign that a determined operative can commit fraud with electronic voting machines, even if there is a software based verification regime and ironclad security. All that will be needed to cheat the system is knowledge of the methods used to detect cheating.
My suggestions for the campaign would be these:
1. All data collected by the voting machines must be stored locally on each machine as well as transmitted to the server. All electronic voting machines must be quarantined after election day. They may not be connected to any kind of modem and they must be turned off immediately after the last person votes.
2. The exact compiled software, the source code, and the software architecture used for data assimilation must be provided to the campaigns before the election and the campaigns should have the right to visit any computer used in the vote and view the contents of the harddrive and RAM before election day, during election day, and after election day.
3. If it is not too late to organize this, I would propose an image recognition based verification system that would be installed in random voting booths. I suggest simple computers with small, simple cameras that image the monitor and record the result of the vote by video-recording and processing the confirmation page. Since this would provide a result that is completele independent from the processor of the voting machine itself, it would yield, at least for that particular machine, an independent record of the vote.