Joe Lieberman edging up on Clark in New Hampshire!

[Walt Starr]

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040113/dctu064_1.html

The poll also found the following on the Presidential Candidates:

Howard Dean 31%
Wesley Clark 19%
Joe Lieberman 13%
John Kerry 11%
Dick Gephardt 4%
John Edwards 4%
Don't Know 11%
Other 3%

Note that Kerry is tied with Don't know. some other statistics:

66 Percent of Likely Democratic Voters Say the U.S. Should Have a Missile Defense System
64 Percent of Likely Voters Support Deployment of Current Partial Missile Defense System




It's clear, we cannot stake this election on risky candidates who were against the war or who have waffled on the war. Only one candidate in the field offers the strength on national defense that is necessary to win against Bush when the concerns of America are so clear.

Joe Lieberman is the only electable candidate because of this.

[Name removed]

1. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Democrats unite]

2. You forgot to mention that Clark is...

Edging up on Dean.

[Exgeneral]

3. I think we have a problem

I just got a phone call from Lieberman campaign! No one has called from Clark04. Everywhere I went today, there was Joe Lieberman!

I keep telling my wife " ignore Joe at your own peril" After all he did WIN the last time out. He's a proven commodity.

[Walt Starr]

8. The New Hampshire strategy is working!

Joe Lieberman is going to surprise the entire punditry and take this thing!

[PROGRESSIVE1]

4. Lieberman! EWWWWWWWWW!

:wtf: He CANNOT be the nomminee!

He is PNAC-Lite!

:puke:

Clark 04'

[Brian_Expat]

6. Clark is too liberal to be electable. n/t

[PROGRESSIVE1]

13. A FOUR STAR GENERAL with 30+ years in defense is.....

"soft on terrorism"! You Lieberman supporters make me sick. Hopefully someone will challenge him in 06' in the primary for the senate. President Lieberman (Heaven Forbid) would make UNILATTERAL, PRE-EMPTIVE, ILLEGAL WAR, just as Bush has!

Wesley Clark opposed the war in Iraq. How does this make him to "liberal" and soft on terror??? B.S!

[Brian_Expat]

5. Joe's rising numbers are proof of his electability

People are looking at the soft-on-terror Democrats, the ones who get endorsements from people they think are ultra-liberals, and they're voting for Joe instead. Joe is getting lots of swing voter support, and it's those swing voters who will win this election for us!

[Name removed]

7. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[maxanne]

9. Joe's been a Democrat

a lot longer than 3 months!!

[Walt Starr]

10. I'm sorry, but all of the other candidates are too liberal

They are all soft on terror.

There is only one place to find a candidate hard on terror, the Lieberman campaign.

Only Lieberman is electable.

[imhotep]

11. you win

the most ironic post of the year.

[nomaco-10]

12. Yep, everyone has underestimated Joe...

Joe is coming on strong. He'll be a powerhouse in the northeast and many parts of the south. We know he can win Florida, after all he already did in 2000. Joe is a dem with experience and the electability that we need to beat bush*. Joe is the only candidate that can beat bush*
GO JOE!!!