Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Final Zogby tracking: Kerry 25%, Dean 22% Edwards 21% Gep 18%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:28 AM
Original message
Final Zogby tracking: Kerry 25%, Dean 22% Edwards 21% Gep 18%
Per Zogby Kerry had another strong day on Sunday, Dean has bounced back, Edwards came on strong, and only Gep faded.

www.zogby.com

Well now it is up to the voters. It is close race among all four men and lets see who will have the organization and enthusiasm to get out their vote tonight. Should be an interesting night ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buckeye1 Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. WOW!
Looks like a dead heat. Using these numbers no one will win. Small numbers Iowa will be split 4 ways.

Maybe someone should have found "Radar".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnziii Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Polls are pretty useless
This pole is pretty useless. It has a margin of error of at least 4.5%
Plus it only represents Iowa caucus voters that were home. If say Most of Dean's supporters were at a ralley or out knocking on doors then his numbers may show lower than they really are.

Also we need to know what list Zogby used to make these phone calls. What was the exact question asked and how it was asked.

Example: When given a list of names some people polled will answer with the first name only because it was the first on the list.
So was the list always read the same way? Were the names switched around for each call.

There are so many variable in poll taking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Polemonium Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This has always been my opinion of polls also
They are biased, and inaccurate. They are also all we have available to get a snap-shot of public opinion. I don't know how this thing is going to play out, but I would be shocked if the numbers represented in this polling data match the results. If they do I might just quit posting about how crappy polls are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. But when it's Dean leading in NH

somehow doubts are not warranted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC