Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Looks like the Dean exodus is almost complete

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:48 PM
Original message
Looks like the Dean exodus is almost complete
Or else all of my friends are working today.

With the recent Kucinich news, it seems like we are entering the surrealistic phase of the fight.

Dennis, the anti-war candidate par excellance, announes a deal with the pro-IWR Edwards.

And McGovern--the former Dem candidate most reviled by Clark supporters--endorses Clark!!!!

Strange days indeed.

Most peculiar, momma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please don't include me
in a group that reviles Senator McGovern. I may look back at the election with a painful feeling but I never have said anything disrespectful of the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. me too - I voted for McGovern and plan to vote for Clark
to original message - where did you get this idea??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. More like strange bedfellows
Actually, the McGovern thing isn't a total surprise. The guy IS a World War II vet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Sly Kal Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think McGovern is an oddball
Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I said "many," not "all"
Anyway, you probably need to read up on George:

http://www.mcgovernlibrary.com/george.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sly Kal Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. I didn't say I was "all" Clark supporters did I?
I said "I" thought he was an oddball. I'll choose my own reading material thank you for your kind suggestion anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Thank you for beinh onest about your position.
I noticed how the loser leftist McGovern suddenly became St. George this week.

Strange days indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. But that " loser leftist " Mc Govern was absolutely right, wasn't he ?
And a WWII bomber pilot to boot. I am really tired of seeing Mc Govern and Dukakis debased by some on this board. I know it is not many, but just enough to tick me off big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I agree with you...re McGovern in 72
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 05:49 PM by edzontar
I rather wish he had supported Kerry or Dean, though, in this round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. LOL....I guess you will be here tomorrow to add to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Hee hee
I think a lot of folks are gonna have their bubbles burst come this evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I hope so--in spades.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. I feel so alone
The responses above just prove my point, of course, he said to the empty hall.

Does no one recalls the endlss barrage of threads comparing the "doomed loser" Dean to the "doomed loser" Mc Govern?

Oh, those were WEEKS ago now, I guess.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Somne of us are still here
but are so fearful that anything we say will result in banning that we rarely post....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I know the fear, Walt...the place has become a ghost town...
Kinda like visiting your old school and finding a hole in the goround--DU as Sunnydale High, post graduation, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. I don't know.
The place seems to be hopping today; I see plenty of action happening.
I'm reading just as many new threads, and talking to just as many people, as usual.

Or is it just that, like a racehorse with blinders on, the rest of the pack is invisible to you? We've been here all along, believe it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Well there is lots of (very weird) DK news--that's for sure.
I am disappointed in him, frankly--

I thought he owed his supporters a clean run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. you do understand that this is a move to make sure DK has some
representation at the convention don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Yes--but it is still weird...
Old-fashioned politics, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. We're getting a clean run.
Dennis hasn't changed an ounce of his stance on the issues, and he won't. He hasn't all of a sudden buddied up with a previous enemy; he and Edwards have been cordial all along. As he indicated on the Daily Show months ago. There is nothing dirty here. It's the voters that will make the decision.

The commitment to Dennis runs deep among his supporters. This is a win/win for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. You're misinterpreting the comparison. See response #13.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I'll respond
I HAVE compared the popular movements of the McGovern and Dean campaigns. I think the comparisons are valid. In other words the type of strong support they had was due to a similar populist message, anti-war type message. There are other similarities.

There are certainly differences as well. And I'll mention one of them. Dean is not the liberal that McGovern is. That would probably be to his advantage in the General Election.I think McGovern just got wupped by Nixon strategists. They put together some very effective tv ads for instance.

Anyways, I think you are reaching in your connection of election history and dislike for the man himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Reviles McGovern? I think you're misunderstanding the comparison.
I beg to differ. I doubt that you'll find too many instances of Clark supporters "reviling" McGovern.

Perhaps your assertion is related to Clark supporters (and many, many others) referring to Dean as the next McGovern. If so, you are confusing results with ideals and interpreting dislike where none exists.

People aren't comparing McGovern to Dean based on ideals. The Dean/McGovern comparison is based on an expectation of a similar outcome in their respective elections.

It's quite obvious to anyone that understands their stances that Dean is quite dissimilar to McGovern from a political sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. The relevant term was "doomed loser," of course...
And the sheer profusion of these threads in the recent past renders the irony of the endorsement rich, by any measure, or so it seems to me.

Strange days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Irony is one thing. "Revilement" is another.
Yes, it is ironic that Clark has been endorsed by McGovern. But, your interpretation that Clark supporters were making the comparison out of revilement is misguided, at best, and as most of them would very likely tell you, completely inaccurate.

Do you think Clark supporters hate Mondale, too? That comparison has been made nearly as often. Oh, and don't forget Dukakis. Clark supporters must just hate that guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I would love to tell you what i really think...
But the rules do not allow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Only politically naive, single-issue supporters of

DK would be upset by this. No DU Kucinich supporters have expressed dismay, only DU Dean supporters, which is interesting.

Politicians have to work with people they don't agree with on many issues. This is an example of two who agree on a lot, though disagreeing about the war. Edwards and Kucinich are both concerned about the people of America who are not rich. They are both concerned about how taxes hurt the poor and middle class and how healthcare has become something for the rich. They are both strongly pro-union, both coming from union families. Each man grew up in poverty. They've gotten to know and like each other while campaigning,

Where's the problem?

I voted for McGovern -- the only vote I'm really proud of -- so I congratulate Clark on that endorsement. It is a plus for Clark in my book, one of the few endorsements I'd take seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I voted for McGovern too.
But I'll not supprt Clark, the general with the glistening medals, until he is the last one standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. not so strange
Except for Iraq vote, Edwards and Kucinich are not that far apart. At the Nodaway Diner in Greenfield on Friday, Edwards practically recited Kucinich's 10-point plan for putting the UN in charge of Iraq and brining our troops home as soon as possible. Edwards does not belittle an exit strategy as cut & run. And Edwards speaks about about defense contractor profiteering. Dean in contrast has suggested that our troops will be in Iraq for years and is unwilling to discuss cuts in defense spending.

As for McGovern, no suprise. Its all a part of Dean Act II--The Endorsements, brought to you by Joe Trippi. Clearly, the first Act played better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Strange enough--given DK's statements that the war is THE issue..
And the responses on the DK blogs have been much more varied and spirited than what I read here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
32. So everyone wants to engage on the DK or Clark issues...
Which kinda proves my point.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. too cryptic for me
care to elaborate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I mean there are very few Dean supprters left on this board...
It is pitiful..and a testament to the destructive and corrosive power weilded by a handful of disruptors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. even if your perception
was accurate, the reasons may not be. Thats about all I'll say, feel free to blame whomever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:11 PM
Original message
Yes, looking around this last week.....I think what you say is true. I
didn't want to believe it and since I've wavered between Dean/Kucinich, but given to both, I've not been "partisan." But, it's a lonely place.

And one needs to wear a flame proof to get past the "gleeful digs and jibes." It's like watching "Crossfire" being around here.

But, then I would be accused of "pitiful whining," because my candidates
are supposedly "going down" tonight. And, those I don't support are on the road to Election with smooth sailing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
35. Yeah, it's almost as ironic...
...as Dean supporters going ga-ga over the endorsement from pro-IWR Tom Harkin.

Or as ironic as Dean supporters embracing the endorsement of the DLC/centrist poster boy Al Gore.

Or as ironic as folks bashing Michael Moore for his support of Nader, while at the same time embracing Molly Ivins, who also supported Nader.

Yep, strange days indeed :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
36. pretty strange indeed....but this is a caucus
I know it's pretty strange to me too....as a dean supporter Dennis was my second choice. However, this is Iowa and the caucus primarily serves to cull the field of candidates. Whoever wins here is in no way guaranteed of moving up the food chain...it's going to be a long primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. McGovern isn't 'reviled'
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 07:12 PM by Piperay
by Clark supporters, I have never reviled him. I have enormous respect for the man and not because he endorsed Clark, I love and respect him no matter who he endorsed. I have a fear regarding all the Democratic candidates that 2004 is going to turn into a rout with chimp winning in a landslide just like what happened in 1972.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. Dean is not a TRUE Progressive. That's why he can't get their support.
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 07:14 PM by gore-is-my-president
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgpenn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. "the former Dem candidate most reviled by Clark supporters" WHAT?
Where do you come off with a line like that? post anything, be it news article, DU post, anything that backs this up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC