Next terror attack - NONE of this "we're all Americans" shit. OK?

[MikeG]

While the fires are still smoking we should be blaming it on Bush.

Anyone agree?

[musette_sf]

1. Hey, I was there three years ago.

No argument from me.

[babylonsister]

2. ABSOLUTELY! And ya know what? He deserves

all the blame as far as I'm concerned.

[LisaL]

3. That is if we are still here to blame it on Bush.

:eyes:

[xultar]

4. I keep my don't blame me I voted Kerry sticker in my car. So, if

anything happens I can put it on immediately.

[global1]

8. Why Wait Till Something Happens? n/t

[Obviousman]

5. What cracks me up

is that they would have gone for Kerry's scalp if a terror attack happened. With Bush, it will only add to his "legacy" of great leadership.
The one thing Kerry should have said was "Bush does not have the definative handbook on how to fight terror. It just happened on his watch."

[genieroze]

6. Oh, In Spades! eom

[MatrixEscape]

7. Me no play Nationlism when questions need to be asked!

I was on that bus last time, as well.

[TwilightZone]

9. We can agree all we want, but unfortunately, the vast majority

will jump right back on the bandwagon.

Hell, I didn't jump on it last time. Welcome to the 9%!

[Name removed]

10. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[uppityperson]

11. definitely, loudly and vigorously

[Deep N RedLand]

12. Will properly give credit where credit is due.

While it would also be tempting to throw it up into the face of all those ignorant Bush backers and blame them we'd be no better than the rhetoric the Bushites spewed after 9/11.
I just wonder if King George will still try to scapegoat someone else again or the GOP will bring out the old "Well, Clinton know about these threats and did nothing. So we just inherieted the problem like the economy" bullshit again.

[Brundle_Fly]

13. THE MESSAGE SHOULD BE

NOW IT HAS BEEN PROVEN, GEORGE W BUSH CAN'T

Keep America safe, and it has to be repeated over and over...

Even as they try to squirm out of the accusation with their denial, repeated over and over, spoken to everyone...

Many of these goobers, apparently only here the things that are hyptnotized into their brains.....

"osama, saddam, wmd, same thing....ohh you are getting sleepy"
STFU FOX NEWS, GEORGE W. BUSH CAN'T KEEP AMERICA SAFE!

[tedoll78]

14. I will blame Bush loudly and repeatedly.

I will also point-out that it was most likely Blue territory that was attacked. Blue counties. Blue precincts.
Blue citizens, who voted for more intelligent anti-terror tactics.. not empty rhetoric and retarded posturing.

Terrorists don't attack Red turf.
They don't attack the Wal-Mart on the outskirts of a one-traffic light cow town.
They don't attack the honkeytonkin' bar out on highway six.
They don't attack the little ol' antique store on the town square.
They don't attack the farmers' market off the square.

They'll attack skyscrapers in Blue territory.
They'll attack stadiums in Blue cities.
They'll attack the supermalls in Blue turf.
They'll attack the public venues that Blue citizens frequent daily.

Of course, Red Turfers - having the luxury of never really wearing a target on their backs on a daily basis - don't want to admit this.

When the attack comes, I'll be sure to direct my first words to the terrorists.

But after that, I'll have harsh words for the RedLand Dwellers who enabled policies that left Blue Turf vulnerable.

[Deep N RedLand]

18. Bush only concerns himself with the states who supported him.

Here's even more sobering statistics:
According to a 2003 study by the Public Policy Institute of California commisioned by Time there has been a major descrepancy in the distribution of state Homeland Security funds.
As an example, red Alaska and North Dakota got twice as much money as blue New York (the most likely place for another attack). Red state Wyoming, where the biggest crime is likely bored teens tipping cows, recieved FOUR times more funds than California,another blue state.

So it's true that security funding is more likely motivated by partisian considerations that favor secure states at the expense of vulnerable ones.

Even in this Repub stronghold I'm trapped in, our county's inept sheriff-for-life, another repub who was re-elected again by voters who fear change more than a piss-poor record, recieved generous funds for media percieved threats. News reports abounded after 9/11 about the need for the highest security as if Osama was plotting his next move and deceiding "I'm going to Disney World!" and the county, with alot of high repub connections pushed it through. As if the SAMs in Cinderella's Castle wasn't defense enough.

Add to fact while we've all had King George forced upon us (again), Floridian blues have suffered double by also having his pumpkin head brother for two terms now. The entrenched repub mentality along with ballot fraud the media has softpedaled has been a losing proposition for change here.

[RafterMan]

15. Well, he did say

"Bring 'em on".

[PlanetBev]

16. I don't want to see Dems hugging Repubs and singing "Kumbaya"

How many times did Cheney say, "if Kerry wins, we'll be attacked?" If we get attacked again, I plan to rub this statement in the faces of every Bush votin' idiot.

[leftofthedial]

17. But WE are all Americans

THEY, however, are Murkans.

[MrSlayer]

19. If I don't die in it I'm immediately blaming the Chimp.

Because they will cause the next one the same way they caused the first one.

[donheld]

20. we're all Americans

That lasted about a week.