There is a part of me that agrees the Abu Ghraib atrocities were sanctioned "from above"...and there's another part of me that thinks that the "scapegoat" defense is a crock of horseshit.
So, obviously, I posted this because I am interested in what YOU think. I'm skeptical about that smile being COMPLETELY due to a "breakdown of leadership."
Let's also remember that "highest levels of the military bureaucracy and the Bush administration" includes Bush, the motherf**ker-in-chief, the "mandate man."
:toast:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/041205/photos_ts/mdf785318&e=27&ncid=:Two military guards implicated in the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal in Iraq (news - web sites) were good soldiers caught in a muddled chain of command at a chaotic prison, their lawyers said at the start of pretrial hearings on December 4, 2004. Lawyers for Sgt. Javal Davis and Spec. Sabrina Harman said there was a breakdown of leadership and that their clients were scapegoats for the failures of a system that reached through the highest levels of the military bureaucracy and the Bush administration. Harman is seen posing over the body of a detainee at Abu Ghraib. (Charles Fredrick, ABC News/Reuters)"