CNN just reports: Lieberman says NO to Homeland Sec.

[DesEtoiles]

[aquart]

1. Smart.

[Catherine Vincent]

2. I'm wondering why this is a "Just In" moment.

[BattyDem]

3. Well, what do you know?

He finally did something for OUR side! :toast:

[Protagoras]

8. He didn't do this for our side

He did it because he knows that he would have burned his last bridge here, and was going to walk across that flaming log to stand on a sinking ship full of people who would never really accept him there either.

I give him no credit for saying NO to something which we all know no real democrat would ever have been offered to begin with.

[BattyDem]

9. True ... but at least we keep a Senate seat.

So whatever his reasons - no matter how selfish - I'm happy he said no. :-)

[ohioan]

13. You know what he was thinking?

Wow.

He's damned if he does and he's damned if he doesn't. If he does the wrong thing, he gets dogged out. If he does the right thing, he gets dogged out.

Why not give him credit for doing the right thing instead of trashing him?

[JaneQPublic]

4. Lieberman gave Chimpy his "No-mentum" (nt)

[BattyDem]

5. LOL!

:toast:

[seito]

7. lol!!!

He wanted no part of his Man Date :freak:

[Generator]

6. Does this prove he knows BushCo is the enemy?

Then Lieberman you get no passes. Stop kissing up to them.

[blackangrydem]

10. It would have been a political dead-end for him.

[rodeodance]

11. he is a political dead end!!

[blackangrydem]

12. I'll bet he runs again in '08