had on her BBV fight. Whether he has provided documents or sworn testimony, he still provided needed ammo in what are her purported aims - clean voting. Why so harsh with a request for aid after he put it on the line to 'spill the beans' to her? He DID verify what she was trying to prove, even if it didn't make her $$ in her suit. If we want insiders to stand up & speak out, they won't be too reassured if they see there's no backup when they get in the deep *hit for it. Just a quick google shows he did put it on the line. I don't know what can be done to help the fellow, though. Better minds than mine will surely see this & have suggestions, & I will join in any efforts that I can. Good for you for standing up for him! Can you give any idea what his legal troubles are, without compromising his wishes? What kind of help do you suggest?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=James+Dunn+Diebold&btnG=Google+Searchhttp://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0404/S00199.htmhttp://coalition4visibleballots.homestead.com/BevHarris1.html