http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/112155/index.phpIn the first jury trial stemming from the mass arrests at the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York City,
video and photographic evidence showed that police testimony in the case appeared to have been entirely fabricated. Judge Gerald Harris granted a motion to dismiss all charges against Dennis Kyne on December 16th, 2004, after the defendant’s attorneys produced the evidence contradicting statements made by NYPD officer Matthew Wohl while under oath.
Officer Wohl said that he personally arrested Dennis Kyne, with two other officers assisting, and that Mr. Kyne was “screaming, yelling, and moving around” during the arrest. Wohl’s testimony goes on to claim that Kyne dropped to the ground and four officers (including Wohl) had to pick him up and carry him while Kyne “squirmed and screamed”. Asked explicitly how Mr. Kyne had resisted arrest, Wohl stated that Kyne’s “mouth, heart, and eyes” moved while he lunged around.
However, the videotapes and photographs of the events in front of the library showed Mr. Kyne walking away from the library while police arrested several people, when a police officer in a white shirt yelled “That’s a collar!”, in an apparent reference to Kyne. At this point, two other officers grabbed Mr. Kyne and forced him onto his knees, then applied plastic cuffs. None of the officers in the videotape or photographs is Officer Wohl. Another officer in a white shirt then approaches and tells the arresting officers to charge Kyne with “Dis con
and resisting.” During this process, Mr. Kyne can be heard saying, “I’m not resisting.” None of the events described by Officer Wohl took place, as the images make clear, and Wohl was not present in the videos and did not participate in the arrest.
At one point, Wohl testified that his captain told him to arrest everyone within a certain area. Later, he stated that he could not really tell the difference between protestors, bystanders, and people merely coming and going from the library. The combination of an officer unable to discern between supposed suspects and innocent pedestrians, and an order from superior officers to make mass arrests based on geographic location rather than specific incidents, would seem to suggest there is a very real potential that large numbers of detainees were wrongly arrested and incarcerated