Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anybody watching C-Span - the Democrats are showing a little spunk!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:32 PM
Original message
Anybody watching C-Span - the Democrats are showing a little spunk!
Probably pissing in the wind but at least they are calling a spade and spade by asking for the member to vote down the ethics rule changes - using words like shameful, terrible, we weren't elected to do away with any semblance of moral or ethical behavior. Really using some strong language and calling the repugs to task for their shameful tricks. Go Dems!

Of course, Dreier is giving a holier than thou speech saying we have to have this news rules package to "allow for bipartisan" participation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I got in on the end of it...
I don't understand what's going on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. This is what it's all about:
House GOP Retreats on Weaker Ethics Rules
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=512&ncid=703&e=1&u=/ap/20050104/ap_on_go_co/congress_ethics

(snip)

House Republicans sidestepped what could have been a bruising opening-day fight with Democrats by deciding, at a closed-door meeting Monday night, to reverse course on several measures that could have made it harder to punish members for ethical transgressions.

GOP leaders stressed that they didn't want the ethics issue to sidetrack their greater legislative goals, which include lawsuit and immigration reforms as well as the president's advocacy of allowing people to put part of their Social Security taxes into private investments.

(snip)

Welcome to DU, thecorrection! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That was a good side-step but...
They still require that a chairman from the same party be a signatory for any Congressional investigation to take place.

Man, I recall when Jim Wright flew the coop immediately after there was even a whiff of impropriety. Those days are gone.

But it is nice to see the Dems get their sea legs, and it was real nice to see them align with some decent GOP moderates. After all it was those GOP moderates who were sounding the alarm call inside their own party about this matter. If Dems and GOP moderates can successfully unite on these kinds of issues, there may be hope for the legislative session yet.

Frankly, I am amazed to see an emerging GOP opposition to Bush. I never thought I would see that, but there is one, it is growing, and they are reaching out across the aisle. And we are reaching out to them, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Newt led the charge vs Wright....but when he did same thing, he stayed
with no opposition in the House.....and donors paid his fines

and republicans are SOOOO moral and christian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, & the Dems have been excellent.
Louise Slaughter's opening statement was wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Bipartisan" -- does he mean "ethical" and "unethical"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. have the pukes turned on mcdermott yet?
remember, exposing actual GOP behavior is the worst possible ethics violation you can committ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dickie Flatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ugh... Inhofe is bullshitting about global warming on CSPAN 2
*change channel*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat 4 Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They are voting on the rules change for the Ethical Committee
right now. The BS that was shoveled by Drier was truly astronomical. How he can possibly think that lowering the standards would bring forth more bipartisanship is a mystery. He didn't even try to make sense or give a firm argument - seems like he was just going through the motions because he knows the fix is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. A Rethug slogan.
"Ethics? We don't need no stinkin' ethics."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Biggest shock for me...
was the Dem. Rep. (Gene Taylor) from Mississippi (hello red state!) who really took Dreier to task about the Capitol being occupied by a foreign army in 1812.

I'm glad to see we've got good Dems. in such a red state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC