No retreat...... No surrender..... Sure thing, Sen Kerry

[Botany]

How about Retreat and Surrender!

I understand that you have social functions but this stinks ..........

The Boxer Rebellion needs people w/ a spine.

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/article.php?sid=19452&mode=&order=0

[blm]

1. Isn't this already posted? Didn't you like your earlier thread?

Botany (256 posts) Tue Jan-11-05 11:17 AM
Original message
Please Senator Kerry tell me this is not true
Kerry parties w/ Gov. Ass in Graber. Please tell me this is not true.
Were we all suckered?
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/article.php?sid=19452&mode...

I pray this is an internet rumor.

[sellitman]

2. And a FREE PRESS.

One without the other is worthless.

Just my .02

[incapsulated]

3. Dupe. And Springsteen and Rob Reiner were there too

Enough already. I admit I've smacked Kerry around a couple of times, myself, but let's give it a rest.

[JI7]

4. didn't like the responses you got when posted in the other forum ?

and Rob Reiner and Bruce Springsteen were there also.

[LittleClarkie]

7. They're all in on it, I tell ya

They were laughing at us behind our back. Bruce, Dennis, Rob, Kerry, everybody, man, everybody.

No, he/she probably didn't like the responses. Not enough breast beating and Kerry bashing. To many facts, too many reasonable people. Just no fun when you're looking for ideological purity.

[Caution]

5. jesus h christ on a popsicle stick

A senator accepts an invitation to a party from the governor of most populous state in the country. be still my beating heart. seriously how many people are going to post about this complete non-story.

And dear god, can you imagine it...he spoke to dennis miller...a man who has his own political pundit show on a major cable news outlet, my god! must be Skull & Bones or something!!!

Seriously people, there are actual issues out there, there are actual reasons to criticize kerry, this clearly isn't one of them.

[pinto]

6. It only required one Senator to bring the agenda to discussion and Boxer

assumed that role as minority leader in the Senate. No one in DC, I assume, expected any more than that the issue get a hearing, which it did. Change will come out of that. Not a change in the 2004 election, but a change in future elections. I would guess it was a calculated party decision. I admire Boxer for her accepting the role her position requires.

[txaslftist]

8. Why shouldn't they celebrate?

They're all still rich, Yale's still in charge, and the rest of us haven't breached the walls of their palace.

go populism rah...rah.

[Moderator]

9. You already posted this

Locking. Discussion may be continued here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=277549&mesg_id=277549