As Jan. 20 Nears, Terror Warnings Drop
Faulty Intelligence, Dated Information Led to Cautions
By Dan Eggen and Sari Horwitz
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, January 18, 2005; Page A01
In April, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge announced that al Qaeda terrorists might strike during this week's presidential inauguration festivities in Washington. The warning was part of a drumbeat sounded by U.S. officials throughout 2004 that terrorists were seeking to launch attacks both during and after the election season.
Nine months later, the threat level has been lowered, and Ridge, speaking at a news conference last week, said there is no evidence of a plot to disrupt President Bush's inauguration. Previous warnings, Ridge explained, stemmed from threat reports tied to the elections -- not to the inauguration more than two months later.
"There is nothing that we've seen, not just today, but over the period of the preceding several weeks, that gives us any reason to even consider, at this point, raising the threat level," Ridge said. "Normally, it's an aggregation of information we receive that we conclude is credible over a period of time. But there's absolutely nothing out there that would suggest we should even think about it."
The shift in rhetoric about the dangers posed by terrorists during the inauguration marks the latest retreat from last year's terrorism warnings, which, in retrospect, were based largely on faulty intelligence, dated information or -- as with the inauguration -- an educated guess.....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16499-2005Jan17.htmlOH, joy in the damn morning!! FAULTY INTELLIGENCE, DATED INFORMATION...and those guesses were apparently anything other than educated. When will the guppies wake up and realize they've been PLAYED for fools???? There's just no credibility to this regime. NONE!