|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:52 AM Original message |
Bush approval rating at 44% on Inauguration Day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pam-Moby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. yes and I feel it will get even lower... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadisonProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 12:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
26. It is lower! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angelique (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
146. I still am amazed that he is as popular as it appears he is.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. By 2008, he'll be in the 30's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrat 4 Ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
33. I'll bet an all day sucker Chimpy will be in the 30s before the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DUBYASCREWEDUS (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 09:40 PM Response to Reply #33 |
81. AMEN TO THAT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 12:11 AM Response to Reply #33 |
92. he's already backpeddling on promises to evangelicals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 11:51 AM Response to Reply #92 |
119. Well, Thank God for that. Something good, actually...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 04:42 PM Response to Reply #33 |
130. Yep... the minute he starts talking more about taking away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
61. I wouldn't be surprised if he dropped into the 20s at some point . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 07:33 AM Response to Reply #61 |
103. I would be surprised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 05:02 PM Response to Reply #103 |
131. you may be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obiwan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:26 AM Response to Reply #103 |
143. Yup. The laws of evolution... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Betty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 06:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
75. If he isn't impeached by then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClayZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 03:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
128. He will be doing the PERP walk before then! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obiwan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:29 AM Response to Reply #128 |
144. Good luck! This guy will ignore the law... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_State_Elitist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 07:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
137. All it takes is another 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patchuli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:33 AM Response to Reply #137 |
145. Maybe not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sonicx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
3. the problem is...too few Americans vote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:04 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. true, but his numbers were higher on election day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zann725 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:35 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. ...so they SAID. Just so we wouldn't suspect...a 'mandate' Shrub win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:39 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. according to this same poll I'm citing here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
142. Likely voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. True, but perhaps a majority actually voted against him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DieboldMustDie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 06:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
77. Our turnout would have been higher... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:08 AM Response to Original message |
5. Why, I wonder? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:10 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. $40 million on that spectacle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RafterMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:42 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Social Security might be it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aviation Pro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
32. Bush's proximity.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:00 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Bill Thomas: Social Security reform a "Dead Horse" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 09:50 PM Response to Reply #32 |
84. Great vision -- we'll have Byrd prosecute him when it gets to the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 01:16 AM Response to Reply #32 |
96. Randi Rhodes keeps saying we can get rid of Bush in two years...which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
35. Also his staunch support for Torturer Gonzales |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chelaque liberal (981 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 08:47 AM Response to Reply #5 |
106. Another reason to distrust the supposed election results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohinoaklawnillinois (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
7. Good news, in my book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. walked 1/2 block--my husband said they would have been better off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 09:54 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. The Canadian news reports commented that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gademocrat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 09:37 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. We can hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 11:32 AM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Made clips of just the protests because the Boos were so great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WorseBeforeBetter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 10:29 PM Response to Reply #24 |
141. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Al-CIAda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 01:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
99. 9-11 x 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:21 AM Response to Original message |
8. Such a mandate - sheesh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zann725 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:31 AM Response to Original message |
9. 44%...just about where it REALLY was on Election Day...before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:54 AM Response to Original message |
13. If you think about all of the people who stood up on Jan 20th... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 09:34 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Apparently, quite a few of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
57. The approval rating on election day is slightly higher than the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theresistance (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 04:31 AM Response to Original message |
15. I can't believe 44% support him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
16. It's frustrating as hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
55. It was a huge opportunity lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:06 PM Original message |
It's a lost victory. A sound lost victory. yeay, Kerry! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
17. keep in mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ell09 (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
20. Does this condemn the media or our campaign more? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJCher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:06 PM Response to Reply #20 |
45. stop with the "beat us" talk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 08:57 AM Response to Reply #20 |
107. It condemns Diebold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalinNC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
22. Social Security WILL make it go further down! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 12:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. My guess is it will drop into the 20s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
23. the 11 million Martians that voted for him took off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmcon007 (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
25. Who are these 44%? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. There's a large contingent who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geekgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
28. what about other 2nd term presidents going into term #2? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
56. See my post below: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalifer (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
30. Nice Website.. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:15 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Arrogant's the word! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. Welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. Hello. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janetle (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
34. Look at his ratings the entire month |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tigress DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
36. Even so, they must only pole repubs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Applan (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
37. It's down to 43% today (Saturday) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mbee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
43. The most outrageous thing is that they expect us to swallow that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 06:44 PM Response to Reply #43 |
133. mbee nailed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
44. Fuck. They re-hired the guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cpa (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 08:11 AM Response to Reply #44 |
104. Charlie, you hit it on the nose! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 03:20 PM Response to Reply #104 |
127. remember these are general opinion polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalifer (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
46. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obviousman (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
47. How the hell did we not beat this guy?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. We did. The election was rigged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
manxkat (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:08 PM Response to Reply #51 |
58. Yes, it was rigged by the same people who brought you 9/11: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
48. I predict if it goes below 35% impeachment will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:28 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. meaning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:15 PM Response to Reply #50 |
69. Bush and Cheney, then put pressure on his neo cons to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 09:40 AM Response to Reply #69 |
111. No way they'll impeach both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalifer (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:51 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
manxkat (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #52 |
59. yes, and impeachment won't change a thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janetle (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:02 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. This is true; I do not disagree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
manxkat (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 02:17 PM Response to Reply #65 |
126. agreed -- it would indeed be satisfying for the moment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:17 PM Response to Reply #59 |
70. Hastert and Delay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamesinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 06:14 PM Response to Reply #48 |
76. As Molly Ivans said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tigress DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 10:03 AM Response to Reply #76 |
113. Molly has some great columns, but the chicken eating dog... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamesinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #113 |
122. There is a war crimes court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mantis49 (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
49. 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
W2Hague (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
53. Approval Rating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
54. A glance at Two Term Presidents on their 2nd Inauguration Day: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:49 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. great stats. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
67. I am saving this. Maybe there were even more Martian voters for W |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:52 PM Response to Reply #54 |
72. source please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sorechasm (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 08:26 PM Response to Reply #72 |
79. I'm not sure of Progressive1's source but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 10:04 PM Response to Reply #54 |
86. "What will it take to wake our Country up?" Great question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 03:29 AM Response to Reply #86 |
101. I think the country is waking up.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms_Mary (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 10:02 AM Response to Reply #54 |
112. My grandmother and I were just discussing this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 06:47 PM Response to Reply #54 |
134. WHOA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FighttheFuture (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 11:17 AM Response to Reply #54 |
150. Actually, what will it take for the Media to report that it is waking up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jade Fox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
62. So how the hell did he get re-elected??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BikeWriter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 03:59 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Certainly, they stole it! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 06:02 PM Response to Reply #63 |
74. Yeah they stole it - the only part I can't believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 10:05 PM Response to Reply #74 |
87. Theft and Orwellian contnrol of the media; self-reinforcing loop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TOhioLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
64. Facinating! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:03 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. no, that's not how he did it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
68. Don't blame me, I voted against him.... TWICE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazzgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:33 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Hmph! I voted against him 4 times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sorechasm (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 08:19 PM Response to Reply #71 |
78. I voted him out too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
73. Maybe because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
morffin (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
80. 43% too high |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 09:46 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. I agree but I see your 1% and add just 2% (anti social personalities). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starlight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 09:31 PM Response to Reply #83 |
140. I'm with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
82. See, it's stuff like this that makes me think- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 06:48 PM Response to Reply #82 |
135. HEAR HEAR BullGoose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 07:45 PM Response to Reply #135 |
139. Hi! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Geek_Girl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
85. This pisses my off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mynameissalvatore (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 01:37 AM Response to Reply #85 |
98. they didn't vote for him n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
followthemoney (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
88. Looks like he has spent all of the political capital from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Learning2Fly (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-22-05 10:23 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Even the Republican idiots I work with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
followthemoney (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 12:07 AM Original message |
Small minds don't get the big picture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cpa (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 08:13 AM Response to Reply #89 |
105. Election Day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
90. Let it sink! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jim1968 (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
91. Liars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BUSHOUT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
93. I read Rasmussen saying that 55% disapprove. Please correct! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 01:40 AM Response to Reply #93 |
100. That is for Jan 22 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMPLEMINTZ (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
94. Then why in the hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BUSHOUT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 01:12 AM Response to Reply #94 |
95. Because he made enough people afraid by exploiting the memory of 9/11. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 08:59 AM Response to Reply #94 |
108. He wasn't. Votes were not counted. We accepted that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakemewhenitsover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
97. That's the best they could do with rigged numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mutius (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 07:32 AM Response to Reply #97 |
102. then why is he in office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 09:00 AM Response to Reply #102 |
109. Because the election was stolen and the theft accepted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 09:04 AM Response to Reply #109 |
110. I kept hearing it was 50% --up 4 pts on most of the states last week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tigress DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 10:40 AM Response to Reply #109 |
114. People aren't OK with it, but "Due Process" is "Broken" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
googly (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 02:01 AM Response to Reply #102 |
149. Because a 25% approval can get one elected president, since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truman01 (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
115. Polls are crap.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
116. It Was Most Likely At That Level On Nov. 2nd 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
117. really, where were they on November 2nd? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
118. Hmm. He "Won" at 51%. That is a 7 point drop since election, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cell Whitman (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #118 |
124. Buyer's remorse bounce. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 04:36 PM Response to Reply #118 |
129. That's how many martians voted for W. Then took off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoAnnSimon (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
120. Bush Approval rating at 44% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cell Whitman (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
121. Too bad the S.O.B doesn't have the class to quit when it hits 20. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
123. Let's drop it to 22 % in the next 3 months --- BE-TBO;24/7 (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hraka (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
125. I'll show you your mandate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
132. It was those 10 Parties while our troops didnt have proper armor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
136. Long before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thinkingwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-23-05 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
138. stock up on water and canned foods |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoristheBewildered (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
147. Just heard Greg Palast on C-Span: in Ohio Kerry lead among men & women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
googly (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-24-05 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
148. Y'all forgetting one thing,,,only aprox 50% of eligibles voted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC