So here is a thought: The dems in congress should just vote

[dorktv]

no on EVERYTHING. Think about it, a vote yes will not change the outcome, neither will a vote yes but we then can use the arguement: Do not blame us! We did not vote for it. :)

[Ian David]

1. I had the same idea myself back in November but have been talked out of it

Apparently, being "obstructionist" is a meme the Repugs are already trying to use against us.

[dorktv]

2. I always like to use the like "AND? so what if we are voting no

does that mean stuff is not going to get passed?" UM NO BECAUSE WE DO NOT CONTROL ANYTHING SO WHAT DOES IT MATTER?

[yojon]

3. Maybe we can reframe the meme

so that 'obstructionist' is a good thing.

_______future lament________________________
Remember the Obstructionists of 2004 who tried to save the Union from financial and moral disaster? They put the brakes on the neocon train. What heroes they were: Boxer, Dayton, Byrd. Wonder if we will have Obstructionists like those were in our age....
___________end future lament______________________________

[Warren Stupidity]

4. so we should vote for insane wars

insane fiscal policy,
scrapping of pensions for the elderly,
homophobia,
environmental suicide,
theocracy,
death by illegal abortion,
etc.

BECAUSE OTHERWISE THE REPUGS WILL CALL US NAMES AND WONT PLAY NICE WITH US?

Gee.