Maggie Gallagher on the Newshour making excuses for herself >
Stephanie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:32 PM
Original message |
Maggie Gallagher on the Newshour making excuses for herself > |
|
Says she is a "marriage expert"
|
EVDebs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Au contrere, Mickey Rooney is a 'marriage expert', she's an amatuer ! |
Stephanie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. "story people want to write is Bush admin is buying journalists" |
|
"and people are running roughshod over my reputation to write that story"
Incredibly, they have TONY BLANKLEY on with her - is HE the countering voice?
|
EVDebs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. No, no, no. Operation Mockingbird needs to be fully investigated |
|
you went cheap Maggie, others held out for higher prices ! The "mighty Wurlitzer" you played in is worth a look see. Flip that rock over and let's see who else turns up...
|
MichiganVote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Nobody forced her to take the money and make a fool of herself |
Stephanie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Now they are saying Krauthammer contributed to inaugural speech |
|
and then commented on the speech
I am STUNNED that PBS has a RWer commenting on this issue along with the culprit, moderated by Gwen Ifill, pal of Condi. The Newshour is completely compromised.
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. the Krauthammer thing is news |
|
needs investigation.
And who do they have on for "balance?" Tony Blankley, the Madame at the biggest ho house in DC, the Washington Times! Disclose, Tony!
|
realFedUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Larry King's the marriage expert |
|
well, that or he's tired of paying so much alimony...
|
Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. How many more are there? |
|
It cannot be just the two.
|
realFedUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. More what? Wives or marriage experts? |
|
Larry King has been married seven times, including two marriages to the same woman. His current wife is singer Shawn Southwick. ...
|
jonnyblitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
7. yup she has been yapping about marriage for awhile. |
|
I remember her from the 90's when I used to spend more time monitoring the right wing from a gay rights perspective. She often wrote about homosexuality in conjunction with marriage/families.
I read on an earlier thread in DU today she claims Democrats do it, too (get paid to promote positions). :eyes:
|
dorktv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Classic misdirection...If you do something wrong claim that the |
|
opposition does it so that way they all yell at them and not you.
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. yeah, we all know how much the Dems have spent on PR |
|
and think tanks over the last 3 decades...
That figure=ZERO!!
so Dems on the take come forward so we can see where you got your money from. Any bets it came from the PUKKKES???
|
bobweaver
(953 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Elizabeth Taylor is the marriage expert |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Jan 04th 2025, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.