|
I disagree at least as far as I heard from 8:30 to 9. When Russert brought up values, Kerry countered that the Republicans talk about values, but don't do anything about things like the number of children without health care. He had to drag the conversation into areas he wanted to talk about, so I consider that taking an offensive stance.
I loved it when he pulled out a clipping that showed the rest of the world didn't trust us financially because of the debt. He got his points in.
When Russert brought up abortion, Kerry countered that abortions have gone up under Bush the draconian (used that word too) and down under Clinton. Republicans talk alot, but don't do anything to help mothers cope. He reminded Tim that we already have pro-life Dems, but that Dems like Kerry don't believe in legislating their beliefs to the rest of the nation. He has made his choice, and he supports others right to make theirs. We are the big tent, after all.
I agreed with him that the emphasis should not be on abortion. It should be on education, prenatal care, and other such things. I, as a woman, didn't find anything objectionable in what Kerry said, so it wasn't insulting to THIS woman. As a pro-choice Dem who's personal choice is that I would not personally get an abortion, it helps me to know that there are leaders in the party with a similar stance. When I was ABB, that was one of the first things I heard that I liked about Kerry. It was a "me too" moment. So, since there is at least me, then I guess your "no woman" assertion needs to be amended. You might try "most women" or "several women."
("Always" and "never" statements make my teeth itch and I will often go out of my way to prove them wrong. They are a fallacy.)
Additionally, people need to be reminded that in being pro-choice, we are not cheering for abortions. Safe, legal, and rare.
This is the answer he always gives. It hasn't changed much. So to me he sounded like he meant it, because it's the answer I would expect from him. Some flip flopper he turned out to be (stupid Republicans... mutter, mutter.)
When Russert threw Kerry's initial support of Scalia in 1988 at Kerry, Kerry counted by saying very firmly that no he wouldn't vote for him now, and very directly said he was wrong to vote for him then, as he didn't turn out to be the man Kerry thought he was.
I'm glad I missed the swift crap. I might not have made it to the good stuff. Kerry kept my attention, which is something even I will admit he didn't always do.
And he had some glowing things to say about Dean. He said he thought he'd be good for the Chair, that he appreciated Dean's work during the campaign and that he thought Dean cared about the party and making it better. (messy paraphrasing, that)
Russert brought up that Dean was too liberal, but Kerry corrected him saying that was just a label from the campaign. Kerry also commented that the Chair's job would not to be spokesperson, but to organize and modernize the party. The way he said it, I thought he believed that Dean could do that. He said we are behind the Repubs in that regard, but that he saw the Dem Party getting organized.
All in all, a good half an interview. I might tape it tonight if I can find an hour on a tape somewhere.
|