Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas senator proposes :Should your child be graded on weight?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:05 PM
Original message
Texas senator proposes :Should your child be graded on weight?
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/redir.php?jid=ab335ebaf34af51a&cat=c08dd24cec417021


AUSTIN, Texas - Experts say more than a third of Texas schoolchildren are overweight or at risk for obesity. That figure alarms Leticia Van dePutte, a state senator from San Antonio, who is also a practicing pharmacist.

advertisement

" to see the number of 8- and 9-year-olds that are coming into the pharmacy to get the insulin, or 12-year-olds that take more blood pressure medicine than my grandmother," says Van dePutte.

So Van dePutte is proposing a state law requiring schools to weigh students, compute their body mass index, and send that information home on their report cards
more...

Oh this is going to give kids good self esteem puting it on their report cards!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StephanieMarie Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. What do you want to bet
the guy is a repuke. You know, the party who's all for individual responsibility and staying out of people's business...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Actually, it's a woman.
I saw her on the news tonight (CBS, I think) and didn't catch what party she belongs to. She's a pharmacist and is concerned about the increase in insulin orders she fills for kids. She says she has also seen 12 year olds on blood presure medication.

The irony of all this is, this woman could stand to lose a lot of weight herself.

I have several friends who struggle with their weight and I normally do not comment on a person's size, but I'm making an exception for this woman because of her proposed legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Judgmental to the extreme
We don't know enough about overweight or why some people are and others aren't. I have a friend in her 60s who can never eat enough. Most people in that age group can almost not eat too little. Why? Nobody knows yet. Until we do, it's unfair to publicly point out to a chiled that her or she is overweight. This should be done only in private. It's a matter between the parents, the doctor and the child -- not the school.

Just another cruel Republican scheme. No empathy, no compassion. Shall we start our own planet?

P.S. I'm not overweight. I just don't like cruelty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdsilv Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Abso-damn-lutely NOT!
Edited on Mon Jan-31-05 09:14 PM by cdsilv
My youngest daughter is already handicapped by deafness and she is somewhat overweight. She also lives in Texas. I like the Texas solution to this gal - invite her over and then shoot her for trespassing! It's legal in Texas (shooting trespassers...).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. It's not about good or bad. It's about the Insurance Industry
Who the heck do you think pushes for all these sorts of keep-you-safe-from-yourself laws? The insurance industry is one of the richest, most powerful segments of the economy, and most of the time it flies underneath everyone's radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Exactly, JDPriestly.
It is heartless and cruel. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. How fucking stupid can you be?
Why the hell are these people trying to create laws with respect to schools that are going to ruin kids completely? Fuckin' A. I hope he gets resoundingly defeated in his next election. Jesus Christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obviously this yahoo knows zilch...
...about the seeds of eating disorders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AliciaKeyedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. or other reasons people are overweight
Like thyroid disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. She is not republican
A 30 second research would tell you that. She is a pharmacist.

I'm just waiting for taxes to be levied on potato chips, candy bars, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry_M Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Tax potato chips by % fat I say
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. They are in NJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. who
Edited on Mon Jan-31-05 09:16 PM by gristy
12-year-olds who take more blood pressure medicine than my grandmother

State Senator, huh? Lady can't even talk. But that's just me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, they could start by
removing the vending machines from the schools (and stop letting those that should speak for the kids about this POSE next to them in the school, private citizen or not!)-- fully fund PE classes (notice a lot of schools are not requiring it anymore) -- make the Presidential Physical Fitness Award something to work for again -- and address the school lunches that they serve. Remember, Ronnie let them consider ketchup a vegetable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I remember because of budget cuts
Edited on Mon Jan-31-05 09:32 PM by Erika
reading an article that states only 6% of the schools now have daily PE classes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. yup
When I was in school, and it wasn't that long ago (I keep telling myself), there were NO vending machines, and there just wasn't any snacking. I didn't see it. I didn't even think about it. You ate at lunchtime. That was it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I agree, but it won't happen as long as vendors give incentives to schools
for allowing the machines to be placed on campus. Some schools even get "bonuses" based on the amount of product sold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizMoonstar Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. My only concern is that
schools taking time and funding for daily PE classes often means cuts for arts. I live in Illinois (where we do have daily PE requirements), and my brother's middle school had to remove its music programs from the daily schedule. If you wanted to be in band, you had to come in three hours early in the morning or stay 3 hours late in the afternoon, and there was no transportation available if your parents couldn't get you there at 5 am or come get you at 6 pm most days. This is ridiculous.

And considering that most PE classes serve as school-sponsored awkward moments of abuse for the nonathletic at the hands of the varsity players, I don't think simply increasing the current system is the answer. I always said, only half joking, that they should put in playgrounds and recess for all levels of public school, so that the kids can get their activity with others of their choosing and skill level, rather than be forced to have basketballs thrown at their face by the varsity team (one of my experiences) for example.

Something needs to be done, but simply forcing more PE classes into an already overstuffed, overstimulated school day isn't the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bet this senator was a jock.
If she was clutz like I was in school, she'd never suggest such a horror. It was bad enough flunking PE without being graded on my weight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. This is outrageous! My daughter always had a weight problem and
other children teased her all the time. They know they are overweight, the parents know it, too. She started making every excuse not to participate going to PE class, so she is not made to run, which even with a doctors letter was ignored by the teacher.
Eventually she started staying home on days she had PE, and now she is homeschooling.
They should rather teach not to isolate and discriminate against any child.
Have healthy food at the cafeteria to start with, encourage low impact excercise such as Yoga.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Have you encouraged your daughter to exercise?
I'd like to say that I'm not trying to flame you or criticise you as a parent, since, especially on the internet, I have a tendency to come across as mean when I'm not meaning to.

But if your daughter's young, you can easily start instilling healthy eating and exercising habits in her. She'll have better self esteem and will be much healthier. You don't have to convince her that she's fat or not to eat or anything, and I understand that some people are just genetically healtiher, but even if she'll always have a little pooch exercise and healthy eating habits will keep her internally healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pityfriend Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. Her heart sounds like it's actually in a decent place,
but the solution she comes up with is pretty terrible. How about better school lunches and phys ed classes where you actually excercise instead of play wiffleball 4 days a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. I really don't think this is a bad idea
From what I've heard about this, it's not just something saying "your kid is fat." It wouldn't be so much a grade, and it would only be used if a kid was overweight to an unhealthy degree. Being overweight, especially in childhood, can lead to very serious health problems, and lots of parents can't see that their own child is overweight and need a third party to tell them.

This would certainly be cruel if it was put on the regular report card, because you know that kids would find out what it meant even if it was coded, but if it was discreetly mailed to the parents, I can't see why it would be bad. You can argue that it would hurt the kid's feelings all you want, but you have to recognize that you have a problem before you can fix it, and it will ultimately make these kids' lives better if they get a chance to fix the problem in childhood, when its easiest to start healthy habits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Believe me parents know. When you go shopping for clothes and your child
does not fit into the age appropriate clothes it hurts, it tears your heart apart. Many parents do not have the means to get professional help when it's needed. It is not that they don't know. Fit's in right with Senator Kerry's health agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. You know
But that doesn't mean all parents know. Especially when children are young, lots of parents either just don't see it or shrug it off as "baby" fat when its really a serious problem. I think if it was discreetly mailed to parents, even the children wouldn't have to know, and if the parents already know than it won't make a difference anyways.

And I'm not totally sure about professional help. Kids don't need a strict regimin, they just need to get out and run around; they're naturally energetic and will take to it immediately. Of course, if they're being made fun of for being overweight, they may have self esteem issues that keep them from partcipating in sports, but its not like they need organized sports to keep in shape. Just running around in a park or swimming everyday will get them in shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Just an observation
The few times I've visited the South, I've noticed the restaurants serve far larger portions than here in the West. Texas served the largest portions of any state. That TexMex is great!!!

Does the lifestyle of the region have an affect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. She's a Democrat. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. It is still wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. Never said it was right, but people here were assuming she was a
Republican so I looked it up and found she is a Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
29. From her website
Senator Leticia Van de Putte, a pharmacist for more than 25 years, represents a large portion of San Antonio and Bexar County. A former-five term state representative, she is now serving her second term as a Texas State Senator for District 26. In 2002 she became the Chair of the Senate Hispanic Caucus and in 2003 she became the Chair of the Texas Senate Democratic Caucus. Nationally, Senator Van de Putte is the current President of the National Hispanic Caucus of State Legislators and has been actively involved in the work of the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) for several years. For NCSL, she has served on many committees, subcommittees, task forces, been a speaker at committee meetings and hearings, serving as moderator or panelist on a variety of topics and issues. She was Host Committee Co-Chair of the 2001 NCSL Annual Meeting in San Antonio; served as a member of the Executive Committee for three years, and was elected by her colleagues in 2004 at the Annual Meeting in Salt Lake City to the prestigious office of Vice President of NCSL.

Over the past two decades, Senator Van de Putte has been honored with numerous awards such as the NAMI Texas Legislative Champion Award, the United Way of San Antonio "Children's Championship Award", League of United Latin American Citizens' "Legislative Recognition Award", the Mexican American Unity Council "Albert Pena, Jr. Life Time Achievement Award", the American Lung Association "Public Policy Award", the Hispanic Journal Magazine "The Best of the 77th Legislature", the Texas Monthly Magazine "Session Player 77th Legislative Session", the Texas Pharmacy Association "Pharmacist of the Year", The American Legion Department of Texas 20th District Certificate of Appreciation, and numerous others. She is a strong advocate for children, health care, education, and economic development issues and has consistently authored and sponsored bills to assist families in securing opportunities. Senator Van de Putte has been a key author of bills that reformed our welfare system, revamped our Juvenile Code, and insured children. Multiple civic organizations and community groups have recognized Senator Van de Putte as one of the most effective, hardworking, sincere, and influential legislators in Texas.

Senator Van de Putte currently serves as Chair of the Veteran Affairs and Military Installations Committee, and also is a member of the Senate Committees on Education, Administration, Business and Commerce, Subcommittee on Higher Education, and the Joint Select Committee on Public School Finance.

The Senator was a Kellogg Fellow at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government in 1993. She received her Bachelor of Science from the University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, and she is a 1973 graduate of Thomas Jefferson High School in San Antonio, Texas. Senator Van de Putte, born on December 6, 1954 currently lives in San Antonio with her husband of 27 years, Pete, and has six great children: Nichole, Vanessa, Henry, Gregory, Isabella, and Paul, three of whom are in college and one in medical school.

http://www.senate.state.tx.us/75r/senate/members/dist26/dist26.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mulethree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. BMI alone is pretty dumb, especially for kids
weight / (height squared) = measure of health?

Measure the shoulders or wrist or such and put some bone structure into the equation. Or some fat-fold pinch type body fat measurements.

And whether you use BMI alone or with more scientific data - certainly use age-specific measures. See the chart of BMI/age halfway down.

http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/bmi-for-age.htm

I prefer my old PE teachers method - if you can run two miles in 15 minutes, and do 50 pushups in a minute, and touch the flag at the top of the rope-climb - then you pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. As iposted, only 6% of schools
Edited on Tue Feb-01-05 12:22 AM by Erika
now have daily P.E. Many schools have cut it out completely. The money isn't there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
31. yes weigh them like CATTLE and grade them prime, choice....
and all that sort of thing!

Moooooooooooooooooo :-)

Msongs
www.msongs.com/liberaltshirts.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
34. I'm locking this thread
Reason :

Misleading Subjectline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC