|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ginnyinWI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:13 PM Original message |
The Gonzales vote so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Reed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ironpost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Robert Byrd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. Please let me know how Dodd and Lieberman vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DODI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. Just called Dodd and Lieberman's office -- they have not "issued |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. The are not voting yet are they?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SchizoTypal7 (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. no, vote is tommorow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
27. thx nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DistressedAmerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
5. We need more Mr. Smiths |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. Cantwell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. answering my own question! Cantwll will vote NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
28. She must think it's "safe" to vote against Gonzales. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 01:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. She said she was voting against him based on him not saying that he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 03:32 PM Response to Reply #38 |
53. But not the torture? Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. Biden? Are you sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Biden voted no in the committee n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Who else voted no in Committee?... Schumer,.......n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 04:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. It was a party line vote--all eight Dems on committee said no n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. On Wisconsin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goddess40 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 05:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
33. Way to go Russ and Herb!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 03:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
52. Way to go Russ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-05 01:05 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Why russ does what he does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. My understanding is that ALL Dems are voting No EXCEPT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Yes! Same here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DistressedAmerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. If Salazar votes with this guy, he will be the most hated Dem Since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. There's no reason for Salazr to vote yes--even the Hispanic Caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Just voted Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. I guess he's known Gonzales several years. But even so, clearly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SchizoTypal7 (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:27 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Salazar has said many times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DistressedAmerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. The Weasel Is Standing Up To Defend Him Now? Jesus! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 03:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
47. Salazar D- of Colorado will vote for Gonzales |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
15. Obama said he'd vote No n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wind Dancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. That is good news. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
latteromden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 04:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. Oh, thank god. I was worried there for a bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woodsprite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
22. Probably Carper too, since Biden is voting "no". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
25. Bingaman????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 01:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. He will vote no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
26. Jeffords. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
30. Shhhhhhh,....it's a "secret" *smile*. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeacherCreature (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
32. Finally we are seeing some SPINE. I think they are hearing from us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
semillama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-02-05 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
34. you know who REALLY needs to vote no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 02:43 PM Response to Reply #34 |
46. McCain would redeem himself a little by voting no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
35. Add Dodd to the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
36. Byrd, Schummer, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyn2 (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
37. Clinton = no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
40. Sen.Tim Johnson of SD will vote no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
41. Sen Carl Levin of Michigan will vote no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JBear (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 02:30 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. With all these no votes.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
43. Kennedy will vote no! Yay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
44. Feingold will vote no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
45. Biden & Feinstein actually voted no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 03:18 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. The actual vote hasn't happened yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbieinok (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
48. surely Harkin....he was no on Rice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ralps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
49. Lieberman will vote yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-03-05 03:25 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Okay, Connecticut DUers . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC