Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Note has useful quotes re social security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 12:30 PM
Original message
The Note has useful quotes re social security
The Note has a lot of useful information today re Social Security. This inculudes both their own observations (which cast doubt on the honesty of Bush's proposals) as well as quoting key lines from several newspapers.

I thought this was particularly helpful being an objective, nonpartisan source in the mainstream media.

I have included some of the key quotes from them at Light Up the Darkness Blog at:http://www.lightupthedarkness.org/blog/default.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good stuff there...
From the Note! Thanks Ron
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. May reflect mainstream media's take
What is especially useful in being from The Note is that this may become the "conventional wisdom" established by the mainstream media. If this is how the media covers Bush's Social Security proposals, he will have an uphill battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue4barb Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Peter Jennings on ABC News tonight
had a conversation with correspondent (Shuster?) about social security. It was stated that b*sh is re-activating his thousands of campaign/election workers to push his social security plan.
(think that was the gist of it)

Has anyone heard if they're reorganizing for this battle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Similar comments elsewhere
I didn't catch that show, but I've seen several comments in the mainstream media with the same idea. They commonly discuss Bush's plans to push his political agenda in the context of having a campaign analogous to his reelection campaign.

I've also heard of one hitch to this plan. Some on the religious right said they would not support him on Social Security if Bush didn't support their issues. Note he had to stick in a brief mention of the Defense of Marriage ammendment in the State of the Union. It seemed thrown in there. I bet he didn't want to include it there, but felt he had to continue to throw such bones to the religious right to keep them in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Republicans not all happy with this
In an unexpected blow to the administration, Rep. Jim McCrery (R-La.), chairman of the subcommittee that handles Social Security, said Bush's plan must be changed in a fundamental way if it is to have a chance. McCrery said he should scrap the idea of funding accounts with money earmarked for the Social Security trust fund.

"It seems to me that if we insist on diverting payroll tax revenue, we have ensured opposition from the AARP and probably every single Democrat in the House and Senate, and that's not a good place to start," McCrery said in a telephone interview.

With Senate Republicans privately saying they plan to delay action on the proposal for several months, the president is betting he can eventually overcome opposition by building public support for change, pressuring lawmakers in states where he is popular and spending the political capital that he feels flows from winning a second-term in office. So far, no Senate Democrat has embraced the partial privatization of Social Security.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61523-2005Feb3.html?sub=AR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC