Check out this post by Rude Pundit on Bush's SOTU

[lancdem]

It had me rolling on the floor LMAO.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/

(bad language alert)

[Bjornsdotter]

1. Very funny!

Thanks for posting it.....I'm still laughing.

Cheers,
Kim

[lancdem]

6. You're welcome

My co-worker sent it to me. It made my day. When you have an a--hole like Bush in office, you need a good laugh to keep from crying.

[beam me up scottie]

2. OHMYGAWD!!!!

LMFAO !!!
Rude but hysterical, they should have had this guy on c-span last night to rebut the chimp's infomercial!!!

[meegbear]

3. Thanks for the link!

I bookmarked this guy. He's great!

[lancdem]

7. He is

[liberal N proud]

4. ROFLMAO

[Rainbowreflect]

5. Thank, I think I'll wait until I get home to read.

[LibertyorDeath]

8. Just Beautiful....thanx lancdem

"But there he was, as ever, smirking, winking before talking about AIDS, looking around at every pause in the 88 applause interruptions (really, the most exercise Dennis Hastert gets all year), and telling all the nation, those who love and those who hate him, telling all the world, "Suck it, fuckers." And it didn't matter if Bush once again invoked weapons of mass destruction and state sponsors of terrorism despite the fact that the last time he did so he was lying. It didn't matter if he was lying about the "crisis" in Social Security. It didn't matter that he contradicted himself over and over within the speech, saying, for instance, "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else" just before telling Saudi Arabia they better hop on the democracy bandwagon. It didn't matter if he portrayed Iraq and its people as grovellers at the feet of the mighty USA. Because he knows you better suck it, America, and don't neglect his balls while you're down there suckin'."

much more http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/

If you're offended here's his Contact ROFLMAO!!!

Contact:

Mostly, the Rude Pundit doesn't give a shit what you have to say, but if you have to say something, you can send it here: [e-mail]

[DemoTex]

9. Excellent reference to FDR's Second Inaugural Address (1937)

The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.

FDR

[Warren DeMontague]

10. I respectfully tip my hat

to someone who can spew foul, profanity-laden invective... even better than I can.

Nicely done.

[TexasLawyer]

11. Rude but eloquent...

Here's the eloquent part. Really well said.


It is not "bold" to target gays for isolation and denigration in the Constitution; it is not "bold" to cut domestic programs that mainly help those in poverty so that massive tax cuts can be made "permanent;" it is not "bold" to say that you want to create a Social Security system that no longer guarantees a retirement benefit for seniors and that cuts benefits to others; it is not "bold" to hinder scientific developments under the veil of "protecting life;" it is not "bold" to declare that that we should make sure that people on death row are actually guilty; it is not "bold" to imply that you will use military force to impose your political will on other nations. If this is what passes for "bold" in this America, then, indeed, cowards should hold their heads high and declare that their pusillanimity is actually "bold" retreat. Or maybe such "bold" people will just ink their fingers purple in solidarity with Iraqi "voters." Or the truly "bold" will dress in purple (like Condi).